摘要
萨维尼的历史法以"民族精神"为理论核心,强调法的历史延续性和民族特色,推崇习惯在法律中的重要作用,创立了历史考究的法学研究方法,这使得萨维尼理论成为具有巨大影响力的法学理论体系,但由于过于强调法律的历史传统而忽视法律的变化和发展,使得这一理论具有守旧和复古的倾向而备受学界责难。梅因则以"法律进化"为理论核心,在赞同法律具有历史性的同时,强调法律是进化发展和可以改进的,不仅关注法律的过去更强调法律的现在和未来,成为科学的法学理论而备受褒扬。
The historical method of Savigny, taking ＂national spirit＂ as the core of the theory, emphasized the historical continuity and national characteristics of laws, highly praised the importance of custom in laws, and established the legal research method of historical study, which made Sevigny＇s theory a perfect legal theory system with great influences. However, this theory has been somewhat blamed for its tendency of conservatism and retro,putting too much emphasis on the roles of legal tradition and ignoring the changes and developments of laws.Maine takes ＂legal evolution＂ as his theoretical core, and thinks that law, with the historical characteristic, is evolving and improving. Therefore, his theory, which not only pays attention to the past of law but also to the present and the future, has been widely praised and accepted as a scientific legal theory.
出处
《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第1期1-5,72,共6页
Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
历史法理论
民族精神
古代法
历史方法
法律进化
historical method theory
national spirit
ancient method
historical method
legal evolution
