摘要
2012年修订的《刑事诉讼法》扩大了二审开庭审理范围、限制了因事实不清、证据不足发回重审的次数、完善了"上诉不加刑"原则。本文从刑事二审程序的立法修改切入,以修订后的《刑事诉讼法》实施前后,鲁西南某市中级人民法院刑事二审数据为分析样本,结合刑事二审程序的独立功能和价值,探讨《刑事诉讼法》修改对刑事二审工作的影响及应对措施,并提出由检察机关监督和限制二审法院"自己决定是否开庭审理"和"随意启动发回重审程序"的司法制约机制,真正发挥二审制度的审级作用。
Code of Criminal Procedure revised in 2012 has expanded the scope of the second trail procedures,perfected the principle of the appealing without additional punishment. The new criminal procedure law has also limited the retrial times which are due to the unclear fact or the lack of evidence. Considering the independent functions and values of the second trail procedures,we are taking an example of the data of a city in Southwest Shandong to discuss the influence in the trail procedures and relative measures,resulting from the modification of the law. We put forward to establish a judicial supervision and restriction scheme,executed by procuratorates,to make a better use of the second trial procedures. Therefore,no second trial court will randomly decide to begin a court session or start the retrial procedures.
出处
《菏泽学院学报》
2015年第1期66-70,共5页
Journal of Heze University
关键词
刑事二审
司法制约
理性思考
the second criminal trail procedures
judicial restraint
rational thinking
