摘要
《文心雕龙》的研究者对《原道》篇提出了很多不同的观点,周振甫先生对于此篇的观点很有代表性,同时他也指出刘勰《原道》篇中的两处局限之处,一是刘勰"道"的观点偏向客观唯心主义;另一点为刘勰将"自然之文"与"人之文"相提并论。陈寅恪先生曾提出古典文学批评的一种态度——"了解之同情",这种指导方法为现代文学批评者提供了一种独特的视野。从还原背景的角度出发,可以理解刘勰为什么有这种"不科学"的观点,《文心雕龙》的成书受《易传》的影响很大,同时还吸收了汉儒和魏晋玄学的思想,这些既是刘勰《原道》篇形成的思想根源,也导致其蕴含了两点被后人批评的消极之处。
There many different opinions of Wenxindiaolong· Yuan Dao, Zhou Zhenfu’s point of view is very representative,but he also points out two limitations. One of them is about the meaning of＂Dao＂, the standpoint of Liu Xie is nearly objective idealism. The other wrong is that the writer confused the nature image and the article. Chen Yinque has a method of classical literature criticism：We should pay understand and sympathy to the writers and the background of him. This provides a new viewpoint for us. With the aid of this method,the limitations of Wenxindiaolong · Yuan Dao seem too unreasonable. Wenxindiaolong is affected a lot by Explanations of the Book of Changes, and also influence by Confucian scholar in Han Dynasty and Xuanxue in WeiJin Dynasty. All of these are the roots Yuan Dao,these also the reasons for people’s criticism.
出处
《安阳工学院学报》
2015年第1期73-76,共4页
Journal of Anyang Institute of Technology
关键词
文心雕龙·原道
“理解之同情”
易传
汉宇宙构成论
玄学
Wenxindiaolong·Yuan Dao
understand and sympathy
The Explanations of the Book of Changes
the cosmology of Han Dynasty
Xuanxue
