期刊文献+

精神分裂症稳定期两种治疗方案的成本-效果比较 被引量:4

The cost-effectiveness analysis of two schemes in patients with the stable phase of schizophrenia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨精神分裂症稳定期应用非典型抗精神病药物治疗的成本-效果。方法采用药物经济学决策树模型分析方法,选择期望成本最小治疗方案评价非典型抗精神病药物的治疗效果。结果在1年稳定期内,使患者病情持续稳定,棕榈酸帕利哌酮注射液治疗方案与利培酮长效注射液治疗方案的费用分别为19 539.2元和17 187.6元;而对应的期望治疗成本分别为36 183.7元和35 807.4元。结论利培酮长效注射液治疗方案对精神分裂症稳定期的治疗效果更好,且花费少。 Objective To investigate the effect of schizophrenia stable period with atypical antipsychotic treatment cost.Methods Using pharmacoeconomic model of decision tree analysis method,the choice of treatment plan evaluation cost minimum expectations of atypical antipsychotics treatment effect.Results In a year of stable period, so that patients with stable disease,long-acting injection treatment scheme of palmitic acid Paley cefoperazone injection in the treatment of risperidone and plan costs were 19 539.2 yuan and 17 187.6 yuan;and the desired treatment cost corresponding respectively is 36 183.7 yuan and 35 807.4 yuan.Conclusion Risperidone long-acting injection in the treatment of schizophrenia and stable period solution treatment are better for the spirit,and it cost less.
出处 《中国药物经济学》 2015年第2期8-10,共3页 China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词 精神分裂症 非典型抗精神病药物 决策树分析 Schizophrenia Atypical antipsychotics Decision tree analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1李伟,宗东升,陈玉爽.药物经济学评价方法在临床药学中的应用[J].实用药物与临床,2004,7(3):53-54. 被引量:11
  • 2沈小庆,王珏,盛炳义,蔡志波.决策分析法在药物经济学研究中的应用[J].中国药学杂志,2004,39(9):709-711. 被引量:22
  • 3蒯丽萍,张钧.药物经济学的成本-效果分析[J].药学实践杂志,2005,23(4):251-255. 被引量:68
  • 4国家基本药物领导小组.国家基本药物(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.23-24. 被引量:1
  • 5Mathew TH.A blinded,long-team,randomized multicenter study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation:results of three years.Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study[J]. Transplantation,1998,65(11):1450-1454. 被引量:1
  • 6Suleymanlar G, Tuncer M, Sarikaya M. The cost effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in the first year after living related renal transplantation[J].Transplant Proc, 2001,33(5): 2780-2781. 被引量:1
  • 7Keown PA,Balshow R,Krueger H,et al. Economic analysis of basiliximab in renal transplantation[J].Transplantation, 2001, 71(11): 1573-1579. 被引量:1
  • 8Keown P. Analysis of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for immunosuppressive protocols in renal transplantation[J].Transplant-Proc,1999, 31(1-2):1140-1141. 被引量:1
  • 9Wuthrich RP, Weinreich T,Ambuhl PM,et al. Reduced kidney transplant rejection rate and pharmacoeconomic advantage of mycophenolate mofetil[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant,1999,14(2):394-399. 被引量:1
  • 10Neuhauser D,Lewicki AM.What do we gain from the sixth stool guaiac? NEJM,1975,293(5):226 被引量:1

共引文献72

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部