期刊文献+

高血压治疗依从性量表在农村老年患者中的信效度检验 被引量:6

Reliability and validity of therapeutic adherence scale for hypertensive patients in the rural elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:考察高血压治疗依从性量表( therapeutic adherence scale for hypertensive patients , TASHP)应用于老年高血压患者的信度和效度。方法应用TASHP量表对190例居住在农村地区的老年高血压患者进行面对面访谈调查。结果信度检验显示量表总的内部一致性信度Cronbach α系数为0.782,各因子的Cronbach α系数为0.642~0.798,效度检验结果显示量表总分与各因子分之间的相关系数为0.401~0.833(P<0.05),探索性因素分析各条目的负荷值为0.464~0.828,4个公因子累计方差贡献率63.568%。用结构方程进行验证,其拟合指数分别为χ2/df =1.314, GFI =0.874, CFI =0.919, RMSEA=0.041。结论 TASHP具有较好的信效度,可用于评估农村地区老年高血压患者的治疗依从性。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the therapeutic adherence scale for hypertensive patients (TASHP) in the rural elderly.Methods We used TASHP to collected data through face to face interview in the 190 elderly hypertensive patients .Results The total Cronbach αcoefficient of TASHP was 0.782 and the Cronbach αcoefficient of each factor was 0.642~0.798.The coefficient correlation between total score and each factor was 0.401~0.833(P〈0.05);exploratory factor analysis showed that the loading value of each item in the common factor was 0.401 ~0.833,four factors explained 63.568%.The confirmatory factor analysis of the TASHP showed that χ? /df,GFI,CFI,and RMSEA were 1.314, 0.874, 0.919 and 0.041, respectively .Conclusions It suggests that TASHP is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the treatment adherence in the elderly hypertensive patients in the countryside .
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2015年第4期548-550,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基金 2012年蚌埠市重点医药卫生科技指导性项目(ZD0401)
关键词 高血压 治疗依从性 老年患者 信度 效度 Hypertension Treatment adherence The elderly patients Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献126

  • 1张里程,汪宏,王禄生,萧庆伦.中国西部农村居民健康相关生命质量研究[J].中国卫生经济,2005,24(3):8-11. 被引量:55
  • 2李秀央,郭永松,张扬.付出-获得不平衡量表中文版的信度和效度[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(1):25-28. 被引量:72
  • 3宋亦男(综述),李红(审校).护理人员职业环境危害因素的研究进展[J].国际护理学杂志,2007,26(1):6-9. 被引量:26
  • 4许卫华,王奇,梁伟雄.慢性疾病患者治疗依从性的测量[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(8):763-764. 被引量:40
  • 5Koschack J, Marx G, Schnakenberg J, et al. Comparison of two self- rating instruments for medication adherence assessment in hyperten- sion revealed insufficient psychometric properties [ J]. J Clin Epidemi- ol, 2010, 63(3) : 299 - 306. 被引量:1
  • 6Berni A, Ciani E, Cecioni I, et al. Adherence to antihypertensive therapy affects ambulatory arterial stiffness index [ J ]. Eur J Intern Med, 2011,22(1): 93-98. 被引量:1
  • 7ZeUer A, Schroeder K, Peters T J. An adherence self-report question- naire facilitated the differentiation between nonadherence and nonre- sponse to antihypertensive treatment[ J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61 (3) : 282 - 288. 被引量:1
  • 8Elliott W J. Improving outcomes in hypertensive patients: focus on ad- herence and persistence with antihypertensive therapy[ J]. J Clin Hypertens ( Greenwich), 2009, 11 (7) : 376 - 382. 被引量:1
  • 9Mancia G, De-Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension : The Task Force for the Man- agement of arterial hypertension of the european society of hypertension (ESH) and of the european society of cardiology (ESC) [ J]. J Hypertens, 2007, 25(6) : 1105 -1187. 被引量:1
  • 10Morisky D E, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, et al. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting[ J ]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2008, 10(5): 348- 354. 被引量:1

共引文献806

同被引文献92

引证文献6

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部