摘要
针对信息网络中虚假言论引发的犯罪现象及其向现实社会蔓延所造成的社会危害与司法难题,"两高"通过颁布抽象性司法解释的形式为运用刑罚手段规制网络中的虚假言论行为提供了可行性依据。由于我国的传统《刑法》立足现实社会,现实中《刑法》在应对虚拟网络犯罪时具有相对的局限性,出台抽象性司法解释来应对网络言论失范行为及其新型犯罪样态时,应当以"维护网络秩序"与"适应网络特点"为向度,并恪守刑法的谦抑性与罪刑法定原则之限度。
Cyber false speech causes crimes, which causes harm to society and judicial difficulties in reality. The Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate provide practicable basis for regulating cyber false speech with criminal penalties through promulgating abstract judicial explanation. As China's criminal law is based on real society, the real criminal law has limitation in dealing with cyberspace crimes. So dealing with anomie of cyber speech and new types of crime by abstract judicial explanation,"to maintain network order" and "to adapt to the network features" should be its dimensions;restraint of the criminal law and the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime should be its limit.
出处
《净月学刊》
2015年第1期90-94,共5页
Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy
基金
辽宁省社科规划基金项目<言论自由的法律规制问题研究--以参与式互联网的兴起为背景>阶段性研究成果
项目编号:L13CFX013
关键词
网络言论失范
网络犯罪
刑法介入
向度
限度
anomie of cyber speech
cyber crime
intervention of criminal law
dimension
limit
