摘要
纵观历史,每个时代有每个时代的政治哲学与伦理范式。如果说短暂的秦朝(秦始皇统一六国至秦亡)是以法家的"法"为其政治哲学与伦理范式的,那么西汉初期则可以用"孝"来概括其政治哲学与伦理范式。秦亡汉兴,政权更迭,秦与汉在政治哲学与伦理范式方面不仅悄然发生了转换,而且形成了各自不同的伦理范式与价值向度。在西汉初期的历史进程中,"孝"的强化与"法"的弱化可谓是相逆而行;时至汉武帝时期,法孝之间又有新变化,呈现出同行并进、互为表里的特征。值得一提的是,董仲舒以"父为子纲"的论调对"孝"进行进一步的理论化与机制化,不仅拓展了"孝"的伦理意涵,而且增强了"孝"的绝对性与权威性。
Throughout the history, each era has its own political philosophy and paradigm. If the short Qin Dynasty is the ＂law＂ of legalism as the paradigm of political philosophy and ethics, the western Han Dynasty can be summed up as the paradigm of political philosophy and ethics in terms of ＂filial piety＂. As Qin Dynasty was gone, Han Dynasty came into being, and regime changed. The Qin Dy- nasty and Han Dynasty were also quietly transformed from ＂law＂ into ＂filial piety＂ in the paradigm of political philosophy and ethics, thus forming the different ethical paradigm and value dimensions. In the early historical process of the western Han Dynasty, ＂filial piety＂ was reinforced and ＂law＂ weak- ened in different directions. In the Han-wu emperor period, a new change took place between ＂filial piety＂ and ＂law＂ and revealed the hand-in-hand characteristics and formed an integral part. It is worth mentioning that Dong Zhongshu, by ＂father to son outline＂, argued for ＂filial piety＂ for further theo- retical and mechanism defense, not only to expand the philosophical implications but also enhance the absoluteness and authority of ＂filial piety＂.
出处
《湖北工程学院学报》
2015年第1期5-13,共9页
Journal of Hubei Engineering University
关键词
秦汉之际
法
孝
政治伦理
伦理范式
Qin and Han dynasties
law
filial piety
political ethics
the ethical paradigm
