期刊文献+

企业慈善对员工态度与行为影响的跨案例研究 被引量:6

Cross-case Study on the Effects of Corporate Philanthropy on Employees' Work Attitudes and Behaviors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 慈善是企业履行社会责任的最高级形式。随着战略慈善理念的兴起,慈善对企业自身的价值创造路径逐渐受到学者的青睐。针对现有研究主要从外部视角展开的局限性,本文另辟蹊径探究企业慈善对内部员工态度与行为的影响,运用跨案例研究方法,通过深度访谈和问卷调查4家慈善积极型企业和2家慈善消极型企业,比较后发现,企业慈善对员工工作投入、工作满意度、组织承诺、组织公民行为具有重要的促进作用,对员工的反生产行为具有抑制作用。相比之下,企业内部慈善比外部慈善更能够对员工发挥积极的影响作用。建议企业重视慈善的战略价值,在做好外部慈善的同时不应忽视内部慈善。 Philanthropy is the best manifestation of corporate social responsibility. With the emer gence of the concept of strategic philanthropy, more and more scholars are paying attention to the value creation path of philanthropy for organizations. This paper explores the effects of corporate philanthropy on internal employees' attitudes and behaviors in order to overcome the limitation of current research that mainly takes the perspective of external stake-holders. By conducting cross- case comparative study, it looks into four philanthropy-positive enterprises and two philanthropy negative enterprises through in-depth interviews and structured questionnaires. The study finds that corporate philanthropy plays an important role in promoting employees' job involvement, job satisfaction, organization commitment and organization citizenship behaviors, and in restraining their counterproductive behaviors. In comparison, internal corporate philanthropy has a stronger effect on employees than external corporate philanthropy. It suggests that enterprises should em- phasize the strategic value of philanthropy and should not neglect internal philanthropy on em- ployees while working on external philanthropy.
出处 《管理案例研究与评论》 CSSCI 2014年第6期436-448,共13页 Journal of Management Case Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"基于职场精神力的企业慈善行为对员工态度行为影响机制研究:跨层次建模与配对调查"(71102020)
关键词 企业慈善 工作投入 工作满意度 组织承诺 组织公民行为 反生产行为 corporate philanthropy job involvement job satisfaction organization commitment organization citizenship behaviors counterproductive behaviors
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1Franklin D. Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility[J] The Economist,2008,19:3 6. 被引量:1
  • 2Philip K, I.ee N. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause[M]. New York:John Wiley ,- Sons,2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Carroll A B. The pyramid of corporate social re- sponsibility:Toward the moral management of or- ganizational stakeholder[J]. Business Horizons, 1991,34(4):39 48. 被引量:1
  • 4Vlachos P A, "I;amakos A, Vreehopoulos A, et al. Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust[J], Journal of he A cademy Marketing Science, 2009,37 (2) : 170-180. 被引量:1
  • 5许察金.公民的慈善精神及其培育与发扬[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,27(6):107-108. 被引量:4
  • 6Fombrun C,Shanley M. What's in a name? Repu ration building and corporate strategy[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(2) :233-258. 被引量:1
  • 7SmithG Tile new corporate philanthropy[J]. Har- vard Business Review,1994,72(3) :105-116. 被引量:1
  • 8Campbell L, Gulas C S, Gruca T S. Corporate giv ing behavior and decision marker social conscious- ness[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1999,19 (4) : 375 383. 被引量:1
  • 9柯江林,吴丹,范丽群.企业慈善行为测量、影响因素与组织效应[J].中国人力资源开发,2014,31(11):31-37. 被引量:5
  • 10贾明,张喆.高管的政治关联影响公司慈善行为吗?[J].管理世界,2010,26(4):99-113. 被引量:330

二级参考文献337

共引文献686

同被引文献135

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部