期刊文献+

腹腔镜下胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效对比 被引量:3

Clinical efficacy comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比腹腔镜下胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效。方法选取210例胆囊切除术患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组105例。观察组接受腹腔镜下胆囊切除术,对照组接受传统开腹胆囊切除术。比较两组患者手术疗效及并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中术后情况均显著优于对照组(P<0.05),观察组并发症发生率为9.52%,明显低于对照组的18.10%(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术相比,手术疗效更好,并发症更少,患者负重更轻,有利于早日康复。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with traditional open cholecystectomy. Methods 210 cases receiving cholecystectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases for each. Patients in observation group were given laparoscopic cholecystectomy,patients in control group were given traditional open cholecystectomy. Surgery efficacy and complications of two groups were compared. Results The operative and postoperative conditions of observation group were significantly better than those of control group( P〈0. 05). Complication incidence of observation group was 9. 52%,which was significantly lower than that of control group( 18. 10%),( P〈0. 05). Conclusions Compared with conventional open cholecystectomy,laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantage of better efficacy,less complications,lighter finical burden and faster recovery.
作者 黄炳成
出处 《微创医学》 2014年第5期587-589,共3页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 开腹胆囊切除术 临床疗效 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Open cholecystectomy Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献97

共引文献118

同被引文献28

  • 1Yang TF,Guo L,Wang Q. Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Fac- tor for Converting Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2014, 61 ( 132 ) : 958-965. 被引量:1
  • 2Kim SH, Kim H J, Jung KT. Position does not affect the optic nerve sheath diameter during laparoscopy[J]. Korean J Anes thesiol, 2015,68(4) .358-363. 被引量:1
  • 3Bakri MH, Ismail EA, Ihrahim A. Comparison of dexmedetomi- dine and dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol,2015 ,68(3) 254-260. 被引量:1
  • 4Udekwu PO,Sullivan WG. Contemporary experience with chol- ecystectomy: establishing "benchmarks' two decades a{ter the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy E J. Am Surg, 2013,79(12) : 1253-1257. 被引量:1
  • 5Koirala R,Shakya VC,Khania S,et al. Rise in liver enzymes af ter laproscopie eholecystectomy: a transient phenomenon[-J. Nepal Med Coll J, 2012,14(3) : 223-226. 被引量:1
  • 6Zannoni M,Viani L,Caramatti C,et al. Can we pursue minimal invasive surgery in the setting of converted laparoseopicchole- cystectomy? Consideration about the " MIVAC" approachI-J. Minerva Chit, 2012,67(6) :469-473. 被引量:1
  • 7Hamad MA, Thabet M, Badawy A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open eholeeysteetomy in patients with liver cirrhosis a pro- spective, randomized study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2010,20(5) ,405-409. 被引量:1
  • 8马莹,白萍.医源性肿瘤种植[J].中国肿瘤临床,2008,35(2):117-119. 被引量:13
  • 9张立志.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术临床效果比较[J].中国现代医生,2010,48(5):46-47. 被引量:26
  • 10彭友明.腹腔镜和开腹胆囊切除术对急性结石性胆囊炎患者胃肠功能和CRP的影响[J].中国医药导报,2011,8(22):39-40. 被引量:14

引证文献3

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部