期刊文献+

水杨酸片溶出度测定能力验证的结果分析 被引量:11

Evaluation of Results Obtained in Proficiency Testing for Determination of Dissolution of Salicylic Acid Tablets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以水杨酸片为考核样品,设计、组织并对能力验证项目NIFDC-PT-004中来自31个省(市)、自治区的40家实验室的水杨酸片溶出度测定结果进行了统计分析,对离群数据进行了技术分析。方法参照CNAS-GL02并结合药物溶出度测定的特点,以篮法、桨法、小杯法分别测定的水杨酸片溶出量为评价指标,对各参加实验室的能力验证结果进行了结果总数、剔除离群值后的平均值、平均值±3倍标准偏差(SD)范围、最小值、最大值、极差、相对标准偏差(RSD)的统计分析。评定标准:溶出度测定结果经Grubbs检验法判定为离群值,为不满意结果;溶出度测定结果-平均值>3SD,为不满意结果;溶出度测定结果-平均值≤3SD为满意结果。结果篮法测得溶出量为满意结果的实验室有38家,占95.0%(n=40);桨法测得溶出量为满意结果的实验室有40家,为100%(n=40);小杯法测得溶出量为满意结果的实验室有34家,占97.1%(n=35)。结论多数实验室的能力验证结果为"满意",从而确保测定结果的准确性和重现性。对于"不满意"结果的实验室应回顾操作过程,查找原因并进行整改。 Objective To design,arrange and evaluate the results obtained "from the proficiency testing program NIFDC-PT-004,operated in the 40 laboratories in 30 provinces,"which was intended to assess the proficiency of the laboratories in determination of dissolution of salicylic acid tablets as testing samples and to conduct technical analysis of the outlier results. Methods According to CNAS-GL02 and features of the determination of dissolution of drugs,dissolutions of salicylic acid tablets which were determined by basket method,paddle method and cup method respectively were set as the evaluation index.Statistical analysis was performed on the results obtained from the laboratories in the proficiency testing program,including the total number,mean(outliers excluded),mean±3SD,minimum,maximum,range and relative standard deviation(RSD).Evaluation criteria were as follows.Results of the determination of dissolution were not satisfactory if the values were outliers judged by Grubbs test method;if the determination value of dissolution-mean3SD,the results were unsatisfactory;if the determination value of dissolution-mean≤3SD,the results were satisfactory.Results The results by basket method from 38 laboratories were satisfactory,which accounted for 95.0%(n=40).By paddle method,results from 40 laboratories were satisfactory,which accounted for 100%(n=40).The results by cup method from 33 laboratories were satisfactory,which accounted for 97.1%(n=35).Conclusion The majority of the participant laboratories passed the proficiency test with satisfactory results,which ensured the validity and reproducibility of the results.The laboratories that had unsatisfactory results should carefully review the operation,find the causes and rectify the relevant parts.
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2014年第12期1327-1330,共4页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
关键词 能力验证 水杨酸片 溶出度 技术分析 proficiency testing salicylic acid tablets dissolution technical evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1Data Sheet for USP Dissolution Calibrator,Non-disintegrating Type,for Apparatus Suitability Test,Salicylic Acid Tablets,Lot F,Approximately 300 mg. 被引量:1
  • 2The USP performance test and the dissolution procedure statement..http://www.usp.org/usp-nf/notices/usp-performance-test-and-dissolution-procedure-statement. 被引量:1
  • 3http://www.usp.org/reference-standards/use-and-storage/dissolution-pvt-ranges. 被引量:1
  • 4Certificate of USP prednisone tablets Lot P1I300..http://www.usp.org/pdf/EN/referenceStandards/certificates/1559505-P1I300.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5ISO.ISO 5725-6:1994,Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results-Part 6:Use in Practice of Accuracy Values.Geneva,Switzerland:ISO,1994. 被引量:1
  • 6Aiache JM,Aoyagi N,Blume H,et al.FIP,1997-Joint Report of the Section for Official Laboratories and Medicines Control Services and the Section of Industrial Pharmacists of the FIP,"FIP Guidelines for Dissolution Testing of Solid Oral Products".Dissolut Technol,1997,4(4):5. 被引量:1
  • 7Hamilton JF,Moore TW,Kerner CM.Reproducibility of Dissolution Test Results.Pharm Forum,1995,21:1383. 被引量:1
  • 8Oates M,Brune S,Gray V,et al.PhRMA Subcommittee on Dissolution calibration:dissolution calibrator:recommendations for reduced chemical testing and enhanced mechanical calibration.Pharm Forum,2000,26(4):1149. 被引量:1
  • 9Konieczny J,Cohen E,Thomas A,et al.Validation Technique of Dissolution Test for Control of Drug Quality and Bioequivalence,1980,Presented at the Interphex USA Technical Conference. 被引量:1

共引文献102

同被引文献73

  • 1林立民,刘萍萍,马文丽,宋晓东.能力验证与实验室质量管理实践研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2013,4(4):1288-1291. 被引量:26
  • 2中国药典.二部[S].2010:凡例ⅩⅦ. 被引量:160
  • 3ISO/IEC17025:2005.检测和校准实验室能力认可准则[s].2005. 被引量:6
  • 4国家认证认可监督管理委员会.实验室资质认定工作指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2007:1-48. 被引量:82
  • 5陈文胜,罗建波,刘礼平.实验室质量监督工作探讨[J].华南预防医学,2006,(增刊):105-107. 被引量:3
  • 6陆娟.实验室间比对试验结果分析评价[J].现代预防医学,2008,35(1):130-131. 被引量:9
  • 7世界标准化组织.ISO/IEC 17043:2010 ConformityAssessment-General Requirements for Proficiency Testing[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2012. 被引量:1
  • 8中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS/GL03能力验证样品均匀性和稳定性评价指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 9中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS/GL02能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2014. 被引量:1
  • 10世界标准化组织.ISO/TS 22117:2010 Microbiology ofFood and Animal Feeding stuffs-Specific Requirements and Guidance for Proficiency Testing by Inter Laboratory Comparison ISO[M]. 2010. 被引量:1

引证文献11

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部