摘要
目的比较正品木瓜与习用光皮木瓜,以利临床合理用药。方法通过来源、性状、显微和理化鉴别比较。结果正品木瓜与习用光皮木瓜在来源、性状、显微和理化方面均有显著差异。结论光皮木瓜不能代替木瓜作为药用。
OBJECTIVE To Compare Chaenomeles speciosa and Chaenomeles sinensis for facilitate clinical rational drug useing. METHODS Origin,properties,microstructure and physical and chemical identification was by Compare. RESULTS Chaenomeles speciosa and Chaenomeles sinensis had significant differences in the source,character,microscopic and physical and chemical aspects. CONCLUSION Chaenomeles sinensis can not replace the Chaenomeles speciosa as a medicinal.
出处
《海峡药学》
2014年第11期43-44,共2页
Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词
正品木瓜
光皮木瓜
生药学鉴别
Chaenomeles speciosa
Chaenomeles sinensis
Pharmacognostic identification
