期刊文献+

氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症阴性症状的对照研究 被引量:8

Controlled study on amisulpride in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症阴性症状的效果。方法采用随机数字表法将符合《中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版》(CCMD-3)精神分裂症诊断标准的72例精神分裂症患者分为氨磺必利组(研究组)和利培酮组(对照组)各36例,观察8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评定疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果经8周治疗,两组PANSS总分均较治疗前低(P均<0.01)。氨磺必利组与利培酮组有效率分别为88.9%和86.1%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但氨磺必利组阴性症状评分减分与利培酮组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗结束时两组TESS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论氨磺必利对精神分裂症阳性症状的疗效与利培酮相当,而对精神分裂症的阴性症状的疗效优于利培酮。 Objective To study the effectiveness of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia patients treated with amisulpride. Methods 72 patients of schizophrenia wererandomly assigned to amisulpride group(36 cases) and risperidone group(36 cases). The efficacy were assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) , adverse side effect were evaluated with Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS). Results After 8 - week treatment, the scores of PANSS in both groups decreased significantly compared to the baseline(P 〈 0.01 ). The effective rate was 88.9% and 86.1%. No significant difference was found in effect between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). But the scores of negative symptom in amisulpride group decreased significantly compared to the risperidone group, and had significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). By the end of the treatment, no significant difference was found in TESS between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Amisulpride is as effective as risperidone for the treatment of positive symptoms of schizophrenia pa- tients,but it's better than that of risperidone in the treatment of the negative symptoms.
出处 《四川精神卫生》 2014年第6期505-507,共3页 Sichuan Mental Health
关键词 精神分裂症 阴性症状 氨磺必利 利培酮 Schizophrenia Negative symptoms Amisulpride Risperidone
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1徐婉姣,金怡,黄悦勤,刘肇瑞,何华,陈进.脑电引导重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症的随机双盲对照实验[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(46):22-24. 被引量:23
  • 2何艳玲.阳性与阴性症状量表(Positive and Negative Syndrome PANSS).中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:267-275. 被引量:3
  • 3沈渔邨.精神病学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:602. 被引量:7
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍诊断与分类标准[M].3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:23-93. 被引量:6
  • 5Teran Y,Ugawa Y.Basic mechanisms of TMS[J].J Clin Neurophysioi,2002,19 (4):322-343. 被引量:1
  • 6WiNe CG,Anderson J,Shenton ME,et al.Prefrontal cortex,negative symptoms,and scizophrenia:an MRI study[J].Psychiatry Res,2001,108 (2):65-78. 被引量:1
  • 7George MS,Padberg F,Schlaepfer TE,et al.Controversy:Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation shows efficacy in treating psychiatric diseases(depression,mania,schizophrenia,obsessive-complusive disorder,panic,posttraumatic stress disorder)[J].Brain Stimul,2009,2 (1):14-21. 被引量:1
  • 8美国精神病学会,庞天鉴,译.DSM-Ⅳ分类与诊断标准[M].杨森文库,2001.120-123. 被引量:1
  • 9American Psychiatry Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.4th Edition[M].Washington DC:American Psychiatry Association,1994. 被引量:1
  • 10Mogg A,Purvis R,Eranti S,et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for negative symptom of schizophrenia:a randomized controlled pilot study[J].Schizophr Res.2007,93 (1-3):221-228. 被引量:1

共引文献209

同被引文献100

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部