期刊文献+

中国内地自由贸易区的开放措施与CEPA开放措施的协调性研究 被引量:10

A Study of Coordination of Opening up Measures in Mainland Free Trade Zone and of CEPA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2004年,中国内地与香港澳门更紧密经贸关系安排(CEPA)正式生效实施,这是中国内地扩大开放并为港澳企业进入中国内地赢得先机的重要举措。CEPA实施10年来,为中国内地和港澳的发展带来了巨大的经济效益。当前,世界经济贸易格局正在发生深刻变化,美、欧、日主导的新自由贸易格局正在形成,中国对外经贸发展面临严峻挑战。为应对国际贸易发展的新形势,中国在上海成立自由贸易试验区,并以此为平台探索中国进一步扩大对外开放的经验和做法。上海自贸区与CEPA所涉及的开放性措施存在明显的差异,这给中国对外开放政策的统一性带来挑战。比较研究发现,上海自贸区服务业的开放已全面超过CEPA,而CEPA在货物贸易方面的开放度高于上海自贸区,两者在贸易投资便利化方面各有所长。应协调中国两类对外开放措施,以提升中国对外开放的质量和水平。 Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement( CEPA),which has come into operation since 2004,is a significant step towards further opening up in mainland and encouraging enterprises in Hong Kong and Macao to enter into Mainland. CEPA has brought huge economic benefits for mainland,Hong Kong and Macao in the past ten years. At present,the world economy and trade is undergoing massive changes. A new order of free trade led by the USA,Europe and Japan is forming and China is facing a serious challenge in the development of foreign trade. In response to the situation,Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone( Shanghai pilot FTZ) was established to explore a way of further opening up. However,there is a large difference between measures of opening up in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone and CEPA. It poses a challenge to coordinate foreign trade policy in China. The comparative research in this paper reveals that the degree of opening up in service industry in Shanghai pilot FTZ is much higher than that in CEPA while in goods trade,the CEPA is better. These two have their own merits in facilitation of trade and investment,yet Shanghai pilot FTZ has a brighter prospect. Therefore,this paper proposes that these two opening up measures should be coordinated to improve the quality and standard of China's opening up.
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期124-133,164,共10页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 教育部人文社科规划基金项目"CEPA背景下内地与香港经济格局耦合的实证研究及对ECFA启示"(10YJA790014) 广东外语外贸大学南国商学院重点课题"广东外贸发展方式转变研究"(12003B)
关键词 上海自贸区 CEPA 开放措施 协调性 Shanghai pilot FTZ CEPA Opening up measures coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献46

  • 1方明智,林将.谈保税区金融管理体制与政策[J].海南金融,1994(2):24-25. 被引量:1
  • 2李辉华.我国商品流通与货币流通关系的实证分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2006,28(3):22-27. 被引量:10
  • 3[美]爱德华·肖.《经济发展中的金融深化》,上海三联书店,1988年. 被引量:4
  • 4UN Free Trade Zone and Port Hinterland Development, 2005, p5. 被引量:1
  • 5See Kankesu Jayanthakumaran, Benefit - Cost Appraisals of Export Processing Zones. A Survey of the Literature, De- velopment Policy Review, January 2003, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp. 51 - 65. 被引量:1
  • 6[美]艾伦·加特.《管制,放松与重新管制》,陈雨露等译,经济科学出版社1999版,第31-19页. 被引量:1
  • 7Trevor MSikorski, Financial Liberalization in Countries, Eldward Elgar, 1996, p. 79. 被引量:1
  • 8BIS-IOSCO, Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures , http.. //www. bis. org/publ/cpss94, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9UN, Free Trade Zone and Port Hinterland Development, 2005, p. 6. 被引量:1
  • 10Luisa Blanco, Are Tax Hevens Good Neighbors? An LDC Perspective, SSRN, working paper, July 10, 2009. 被引量:1

共引文献45

同被引文献119

引证文献10

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部