摘要
我国现行专利法在专利权无效判断问题上采取的是专利行政机关享有宣告专利权无效的权限,法院在侵权诉讼中不应就专利权的效力问题进行判断的做法。由于认识到这种绝对行政单轨制的种种问题,具有代表性的改革意见均体现出了崇尚美国专利权无效判断的司法主导制度的倾向。但是,自20世纪80年代起美国通过历次专利法修改,逐渐改变了原有司法主导的单轨制,加强了行政机关在专利权无效判断的权重。显然这一变化与我国学界对于美国专利权无效判断制度的理解大相径庭。特别是2011年美国专利法的修改又进一步确认了加强行政机关专利权无效判断再审查的趋势,值得深省。有必要从制度论上探寻上述发展趋势的来龙去脉,进而对建立与我国专利权有效性判断规范功能相适应的制度有所裨益。
According authority to declare the inv to current Patent law in China, the patent office is granted absolute executive alidity of the patent, while the court does not issue judgment regarding the invalidity of the patent in patent related litigations. Recognizing the fact that there are many problems with this absolute administrative track system, there is a tendency of advocating U. S. Patent invalidation procedure which is conducted by the courts. But since the 1980s, after the amendment of U.S. Patent Law, the United States gradually changed strengthened the executive branch＇s authority to reexamine in U.S. patent is very different from our understanding. the original judicial centered system and the patent validity. Obviously, this change Especially the amendment of U. S. Patent law in 2011 further affirmed the trend that strengthens the executive authority＇ s patents invalidation judgment function. It is necessary to explore the ins and outs of the above trends, and hopefully the study of this trend will help to build our patent invalidity judgment system in China.
出处
《比较法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期170-180,共11页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
国家留学基金委(留金发(2013)3009号)的资助
关键词
再审查
无效宣告制度
授权后复审制度
事后过滤
量的控制
reexamination
invalidation of patent right
post grant review
ex poste filter
qualitative control
