期刊文献+

异质性、机构投资者与会计稳健性 被引量:14

Heterogeneity,Institutional Investors and Accounting Conservatism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2000—2011年沪深A股上市公司为样本,基于企业本身和市场异质性的视角,考察机构投资者持股对会计稳健性的影响,结果发现:机构投资者持股比例的提升会导致企业会计稳健性的下降,在国有企业、成长性较好的企业中这种负向关系增强了,而企业所处地区的市场化程度对机构投资者持股与会计稳健性之间的负向关系无显著影响,此外,相比"压力抵制型"机构投资者而言,"压力敏感型"机构投资者持股比例的上升导致会计稳健性下降更快。 In this paper, we first use 2000--2011 A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange as a sample based on the heterogeneity of the enterprise itself and the market perspective, and then discuss the impact of institu- tional investors on accounting conservatism. The results show that institutional investors staking leads to a decline in account- ing conservatism in state-owned enterprises or companies with good growth, this negative relationship is strengthened and the degree of market-oriented enterprises in which areas makes no difference for institutional investors who hold shares and ac- counting conservatism. In addition, compared to "pressure-resisting" institutional investors, "pressure-sensitive" institutional investor ownership percentage increases will lead to a faster decline in accounting conservatism.
作者 陈爱华
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期75-82,共8页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD790006) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(13YJC630019) 福建省社会科学规划项目(2013B057)
关键词 机构投资者持股比例 会计稳健性 异质性 企业成长性 市场化程度 权益投资者 财务报告稳健性 公司治理 institutional investors share-holding ratio accounting conservatism heterogeneity growth degree of market-ori-entation equity investors financial statements conservatism corporate governanee
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Laford R, Roychowdhury S. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2008, 46(1):101-135. 被引量:1
  • 2Ball R,Kothari S P,Robin A. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2000,29 (1) :1 - 51. 被引量:1
  • 3Watts R L. Conservatism in accounting parti : explanations and implications[ J]. Accounting Horizons,2003 ,17(3) :207 -221. 被引量:1
  • 4Laford R, Watts R L. The imformation role of conservatism[ J]. The Accounting Review Forthcoming,2008,83(2) :447 —478. 被引量:1
  • 5Barber B, Lee Y, Liu Y, Odean T. Just how much to individual investors lose by trading. [ J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2009,22(2):609-632. 被引量:1
  • 6RamalingegowdaS, Yu Y. Institutional ownership and conservatism[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2012,53( 1) :98 - 114. 被引量:1
  • 7Gompers P A,Metricka A. Institutional investors and equity prices[ J] . Quarterly Journal of Economics,2001,116(1):229 -260. 被引量:1
  • 8Pound.Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1988 ,20(2) :237 一265. 被引量:1
  • 9Brikkley J, Lease R,Smith C. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments[ J]. Journal of Financial Ecomomics,1988,22.2):267-292. 被引量:1
  • 10SmithC W,Watts R L. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing,dividend and compensation policies[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1992,32(3) : 163 -292. 被引量:1

二级参考文献91

共引文献512

同被引文献201

引证文献14

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部