摘要
初查是指侦查机关为确定案件是否符合刑事立案条件而进行的初步调查活动。该程序机制最早为提高立案质量而设,此后因"实质性的立案审查标准"及"计件式的绩效考核机制"而逐渐发生异变。在司法实践中,初查行为不宜作统一定性,有些"具有社会调查性质",有些则是"准侦查行为"。司法实践中"以初查代替侦查,侦查阶段前移"的现象时有存在,废除初查程序实有必要。但为保障立案质量,时下的刑事立案机制应作相应调整,包括改革立案审查标准以及改革绩效考核机制。刑事诉讼中"自然演进"所形成的制度虽具有一定的合理性,但必须严格以正当程序为依托。
Preliminary investigation is the initial investigation for the investigators to examine whether the criminal cases meet the standard of placing a criminal case on file, and it is created to improve the quality of Case-filing. However, it dose not move in orbit for the ＂substantive standard of placing a criminal case on file＂ and the ＂performance appraisal system of piecework＂. Preliminary investigation practices have not the same nature, some of them are the social investigative mesures and the others are more like criminal investigative activities. It happens in the practice that the preliminary investigation takes the place of the formal criminal investigation and makes the latter shift to an earlier date. Therefore, it is necessary to abolish the preliminary investigation and adjust the Case-filing system, including reform of the standard of placing a criminal case on file and the mechanism of performance appraisal. The natural evolution of the criminal procedure has its profound significance, but is should comply with the due process.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第9期98-108,共11页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
初查
立案
绩效考核
正当程序
Preliminary Investigation
Case-filing System
Performance Appraisal
Due Process
