摘要
治理过程实际上就是通过权力制约、权力监督而进行廉政建设、达成善治的过程。从这个意义说,国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的过程必然包括国家廉政体系的建设、优化及反贪腐能力提升的过程,其基础和核心是公共权力运行公开化,关键是要坚持用制度管权管事管人,让人民监督权力,让权力在阳光下运行。腐败的深层次原因在于公共权力悖论,即公共权力"所有权"与"行使权"的分离;公共权力委托人公益性目标和代理人自利性追求的矛盾;公共权力"行使权"与"监督权"的失衡。因此,必须加强法治建设,依法治权,构建决策科学、执行坚决、监督有力的公共权力运行公开化体系,健全惩治和预防腐败体系,建设廉洁政治。同时,要完善制度建设,把权力关进制度的笼子里。此外,强化信息公开,让权力在阳光下运行。最后还要扩大公民参与,以权利制约权力。
Governance is actually the process of the power restriction and power supervision to build a clean and honest government,and to achieve good governance. In this sense,the modernization of state governance systemand governance capability includes necessarily the process of building state integrity systemand promotion of anti-corruption capacities,the key of which is to adhere to thesystemof administering power,affairs and personnel,letting the people to supervise power,letting the power to operate in the sunshine. The deep-seated reasons of corruption is "public power paradox ",i. e. the separation of public power"ownership"and the"right to exercise"the power,the contradiction of public interest goal orientation of public authority and agent's self-interest pursuit,and the imbalance of public authority's "right to exercise"power and the "supervising"power. Therefore,we need to strengthen the construction of the rule of law,rule the power by law,and build a systemof open operation of public power,with a scientific decision-making,firmexecution,and sound supervision. Improve the systemfor punishing and preventing corruption to build a clean and honest government. At the same time,to improve the systemconstruction to administer power by systems and institutions,and to keep power in the cage of systemic checks. In addition,strengthen information disclosure and let the power operate in the sunshine. Finally,we must also expand citizen participation so as to restrict power with the civil rights.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第10期21-33,307-308,共13页
Academics
基金
2013年度国家社会科学基金项目"公共权力运行公开化路径研究"(项目编号:13BZZ032)的阶段性成果
关键词
治理
国家廉政体系
公共权力
公开化
法治
governance
bational integrity system
public administrative power
openness