期刊文献+

主体风险规避情形下多属性逆向拍卖利润分配研究 被引量:5

Research on Profits Allocation between Supplier and Buyer with Risk-aversion in Multi-attribute Reverse Auctions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文针对采供双方风险规避的多属性逆向拍卖环境下的利润分配与采供关系建立问题,构建了非合作与合作博弈模型,分析了主体风险态度对利润分配结果的影响,得出建立和发展合作关系的条件,并确定了利润最优分配比例。结合仿真实验得出:1)采供双方非合作时,影响双方利润的因素:供应商成本参数,参与拍卖的供应商数量等。2)双方合作时,对利润的分配比例,受双方风险规避系数的影响;采购商提供给供应商的补贴受双方风险规避系数和讨价还价能力的影响。3)双方建立合作的基本条件需同时满足集体理性和个体理性,而长期合作的必要条件是双方效用最大化前提下的确定最优分配比例。 The profits allocation and conditions of building the cooperative relationship between buyer and supplier with risk reverse in muhi-attribute reverse auctions are explored in this paper. Non-cooperative and the cooperative game models are constructed to analyze the risk attitudes of both sides how to impact the result of profits allocation, attain the conditions to build the cooperative relationship and determine the optimal ratio of profits allocation. Combined with the simulation experiment, it is concluded that the factors affecting both sides' non-cooperative profits include the supplier's cost parameters and the number of bidders. The ratio of the cooperative profits allocation is affected by the coefficients of risk aversion for both parties. The subsidy that the buyer provides to the supplier is affected by the parties' coefficients of risk aversion and their bargaining power. The basic conditions of establishing cooperative relationship include collective rationality and individual rationality, which are captured by the information sharing between both sides and the incremental profits allocation. Finally, the neeessary condition of maintaining and developing a long-term cooperative relationship is an optimal distribution ratio, which maximizes utility for both sides.
作者 田剑 陈曲
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期33-39,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371088) "青蓝工程"中青年学术带头人培养对象资助项目
关键词 风险规避 逆向拍卖 利润分配 采供关系 risk aversion reverse auction profits allocation buyer-supplier relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Jap S D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2007,71(1) :146-159. 被引量:1
  • 2Ray A K, Jenamani M, Mohapatra P K J. An efficient reverse auction mechanism for limited supplier base[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2011, 10(2): 170-182. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen-Ritzo C. Harrison T P, Kwasnica A M, et al. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(12): 1753-1762. 被引量:1
  • 4Hazra J, Mahadevan B. Impact of supply base heteroge- neity in electronic markets[J]. European Journal of Op- erational Research, 2006,174(3) : 1580- 1594. 被引量:1
  • 5Teich J E, Wallenius H, Wallenius J, et al. A multi-at- tribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: Theoreti- cal foundations[J]. European Journal of Operational Re- search,2006,175(1) :90-100. 被引量:1
  • 6Zhang Zhuoxiu, Jin Mingzhou. Iterative multi-attribute multi-unit reverse auctions[J]. The Engineering Econo- mist, 2007, 52(4): 333-354. 被引量:1
  • 7周学广,张坚,杜建国.基于逆向拍卖的演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(5):171-178. 被引量:14
  • 8周学广,张坚,梅强,杜建国.基于多属性逆向拍卖的博弈分析[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(2):200-205. 被引量:13
  • 9Stefan S. Information revelation in multiattribute Eng- lish auctions: A laboratory study[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(3): 272-280. 被引量:1
  • 10Chi-Bin C. Reverse auction with buyer-supplier negoti ation using hi-level distributed programming[J]. Euro- pean Journal of Operational Research, 2011,211 (3) : 601-611. 被引量:1

二级参考文献38

  • 1易余胤,肖条军,盛昭瀚.合作研发中机会主义行为的演化博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(4):80-87. 被引量:106
  • 2徐经意,杨德礼,郭琼.在线逆向拍卖期权和单方支付契约下的供应链协调机制分析[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(4):100-105. 被引量:12
  • 3Tobias, S. , Vincent, A. M.. Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality [J]. Business Horizons,2007,50 :373-384. 被引量:1
  • 4Carter, C. C. , Kaufmann, L. , Stewart, B. , et al. Reverse auctions grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective [J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2004,40: 229-254. 被引量:1
  • 5Pinker, E. J. ,Abraham, S. Y.. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues [J]. Management Science, 2003, 49 (11): 1457-1484. 被引量:1
  • 6Tunca, T. I. , Wu, Q.. Multiple sourcing and procurement process selection with bidding events [J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(5): 763-780. 被引量:1
  • 7Hartley, J. L. , Lane, M. D. , Hong, Y.. An exploration of the adoption of e- auctions in supply management [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2004, 51(2): 153-160. 被引量:1
  • 8Hur, D., Vincent, A. M., Hartley, J. L.. Getting the most out of reverse e-auction investment [J]. Omega, 2007, 35: 403-416. 被引量:1
  • 9Sunil, M. , Joni, L. J.. Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2007, 16 (4): 455 -470. 被引量:1
  • 10Gan, D. , Wang, J. , Bourcier, D. V.. An auction game model for pool-based electricity markets [J]. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2005, 27:480-487. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献29

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部