期刊文献+

血清胱抑素C与改良sMDRD公式诊断恶性肿瘤化疗患者早期肾功能损伤的临床价值 被引量:20

Clinical value of serum Cys C and modified sMDRD formula in the diagnosis of early-stage renal damage in patients with malignant tumors after chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清胱抑素C(SCys C)与改良sMDRD公式诊断恶性肿瘤化疗患者早期肾功能损伤的临床价值。方法根据《中华内科杂志》编委会肾病专业组制定的慢性肾功能不全代偿期诊断标准将2014年2月至2014年6月江西省肿瘤医院收治的283例恶性肿瘤化疗患者分为早期肾功能损伤组(141例)与肾功能正常组(142例),所有患者均接受SCys C检测,其方法为免疫比浊法,同时采用改良sMDRD公式计算其估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。结果早期肾功能损伤组SCys C显著高于肾功能正常组(P〈0.01),改良sMDRD公式eGFR显著低于肾功能正常组(P〈0.01)。SCys C诊断恶性肿瘤化疗患者早期肾功能损伤的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.861(95%CI,0.818-0.904),最佳诊断阈值为1.28mg/L,其对应的灵敏度(SEN)、特异度(SPE)分别为63.83%、90.14%。改良sMDRD公式eGFR诊断恶性肿瘤化疗患者早期肾功能损伤的AUC为0.992(95%CI,0.985-0.998),最佳诊断阈值为97.1 ml/min/1.73m2,其对应的SEN、SPE分别为97.16%、95.07%。改良sMDRD公式的AUC显著大于SCys C(P〈0.01)。结论改良sMDRD公式对恶性肿瘤化疗患者早期肾功能损伤的诊断价值优于SCys C,但是由于改良sMDRD公式临床应用还不是很广泛,因此其性能有待进一步研究。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of serum Cystatin C(SCys C) and modified sMDRD formula in the diagnosis of early-stage renal damage in patients with malignant tumors after chemotherapy. Methods A total of 283 cases of patients with malignant tumors who received chemotherapy admitted into the Jiangxi Provincial Tumor Hospital from February 2014 to June 2014 were divided into early-stage renal damage group(141 cases) and normal renal function group(142 cases) according to the diagnostic criteria for compensatory stage of chronic renal insufficiency issued by nephropathy study group, editorial board of Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine. The SCys C was detected by immune turbidimetric assay in all patients, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) was calculated by modified sMDRD formula. Results The level of SCys C in early-stage renal damage group was significantly higher than that in normal renal function group(P〈0.01), while the eGFR calculated by modified sMDRD formula was significantly lower than that in normal renal function group(P〈0.01). The area under the ROC curve(AUC) for SCys C was 0.861(95%CI, 0.818-0.904), and the best cut-off value was 1.28mg/L, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 63.83%, 90.14% respectively. The AUC for eGFR calculated by modified sMDRD formula was 0.992(95%CI,0.985-0.998),and the best cut-off value was 97.1 ml/min/1.73m2, which had a SEN of 97.16%, SPE of 95.07%. The AUC for modified sMDRD formula was significantly larger than that for SCys C(P〈0.01). Conclusion For the diagnosis of early-stage renal damage in patients with malignant tumors after chemotherapy, the modified sMDRD formula has better value than SCys C, but the clinical application of modified sMDRD formula is not very extensive, so further studies are required to determine its performance.
机构地区 江西省肿瘤医院
出处 《实验与检验医学》 CAS 2014年第5期520-522,548,共4页 Experimental and Laboratory Medicine
基金 江西省卫生厅课题(编号:20141124)
关键词 胱抑素C 改良sMDRD公式 估算肾小球滤过率 恶性肿瘤 化疗 肾功能损伤 Cystatin C Modified sMDRD formula Estimated glomerular filtration rate Malignant tumor Chemotherapy Renal damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Isoda T, Ito S, Kajiwara M, et al. Successful high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy in a patient with acute lymphocytic leukemia who developed acute renal failure during the initial treatment[J]. Pediatr Int, 2007,49(6):1018-1019. 被引量:1
  • 2王海燕,郑法雷,刘玉春,等.原发性肾小球疾病分型与治疗及诊断标准专题座谈会纪要[J].中华内科杂志,1993,32(2):131-134. 被引量:34
  • 3林开颜,张晋,蒙喻,蒋强,宋婷.常用肾小球滤过率计算公式对健康人群评估比较观察[J].实验与检验医学,2012,30(3):316-317. 被引量:6
  • 4V6zquez Rodriguez JG, Cruz Cruz Pdel R, M6rquez Hubert E. Cor- relation index amylase-creatinine clearance to endogenous creati- nine clearance in severe preeclampsia [J]. Ginecol Obstet Mex, 2009 , 77(7):317-322. 被引量:1
  • 5熊阳琼,杨雨文,黄丁能.3761例血清胱抑素C检测对诊断肾损伤临床意义的探讨[J].实验与检验医学,2013,31(3):275-276. 被引量:9
  • 6Roberts GW, Ibsen PM, Schioler CT. Modified diet in renal disease method overestimates renal function in selected elderly patients[J].Age Ageing, 2009,38(6):698-703. 被引量:1
  • 7全国eGFR课题协作组.MDRD方程在我国慢性肾脏病患者中的改良和评估[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2006,22(10):589-595. 被引量:710
  • 8叶应妩,王毓三,申子瑜主编..全国临床检验操作规程 第3版[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2006:1034.
  • 9Groesbeck D, Kottgen A, Parekh R, et al. Age, gender, and race ef- fects on cystatin C levels in US adolescents [J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2008, 3(6):1777-1785. 被引量:1
  • 10Obrenovic R, Petrovic D, Majkic-Singh N, et al. Serum cystatin C levels in normal pregnancy[J]. Clin Nephrol,2011,76(3):174-179. 被引量:1

二级参考文献40

  • 1王鸿利,尚红,王兰兰,等.实验诊断学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:117-118. 被引量:11
  • 2Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem, 1992,38 : 1933-1953. 被引量:1
  • 3Giovannetti S, Barsotti G. In defense of creatinine clearance.Nephron, 1991,59: 11-14. 被引量:1
  • 4Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med,1999,130:461-470. 被引量:1
  • 5Levey AS, Greene T, Kusek J, et al. A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2000, 11 : A0828 (abstract). 被引量:1
  • 6Eknoyaa G, Levin N. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines: Update 2000. Foreword. Am J Kidney Dis,2001, 37 (1 Suppl 1):S5-S6. Erratum in: Am J KidneyDis, 2001,38:917. 被引量:1
  • 7Zuo L, Ma YC, Zhou YH, et al. Application of GFR-estimating equations in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. Am .I Kidney Dis, 2005, 45:463-472. 被引量:1
  • 8Blaufox MD, Aurell M, Bubeck B, et al. Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal clearance.J Nucl Med, 1996, 37:1883-1890. 被引量:1
  • 9Chantler C, Barratt TM. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from plasma clearance of 51-chromium edetic acid. Arch Dis Child, 1972, 47:613-617. 被引量:1
  • 10Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known.1916. Nutrition, 1989,5 : 303-311. 被引量:1

共引文献755

同被引文献141

引证文献20

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部