期刊文献+

中国控制权市场的识别效率——基于DEA方法 被引量:1

Identification Efficiency of Chinese Market for Corporate Control on the Basis of DEA Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 控制权市场的识别效率意指控制权市场是否能有效发现无效率的经营团队,它是研究控制权市场有效性的基础。选取2005-2009年中国证券市场成为并购目标的上市公司作为样本,将样本所涉及的事件区分为市场化并购、政府主导型并购及关联人主导型并购等三类,采用DEA方法来测度并购目标公司的效率特征,进而判断中国控制权市场的识别效率。研究未发现整体并购样本在中国控制权市场具有明显的识别效率,反映了中国控制权市场整体上尚不成熟;但在关联人主导型并购中则反映了市场具备识别效率,也隐含此类细分控制权市场具备有效性迹象。 The identification efficiency of market for corporate control (MCC), which is the foundation of studying the performance of MCC, determines whether the managerial inefficiency can be effectively identified. This article analyzes samples of maior Chinese M&A targets from listed companies between 2005 - 2009, and further divides them into market-driven takeovers, affiliate- predominated takeovers and government-predominated takeovers. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is applied to identify the pre-merger efficiency of target companies in order to test the efficiency of the identification mechanism of MCC. The result shows that generally there is no significant evidence of high identification efficiency of MCC in China, which indicates that MCC in China is still premature. However, the study shows that target companies of affiliate-predominated takeovers are the most inefficient, which seems to imply that the performance of MCC on the affiliated-predominated takeovers is relatively effective.
出处 《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第4期75-80,共6页 Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中国产业合并的影响因素和演进趋势:理论与实证"(08JC630004) 北京交通大学基本科研业务费项目"中国企业国际化的进程和战略"(2009JBZ008_3)
关键词 控制权市场 DEA方法 并购 效率 目标公司识别 market for corporate control Data Envelopment Analysis mergers and acquisitions efficiency target company identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1JENSEN M C, RUBACK R S. The Market for Corpo- rate Control: The Scientific Evidence[J ]. Journal of Fi- nancial Economics, 1983, ( 1 - 4) : 5 - 50. 被引量:1
  • 2JENSEN M C. Takeovers: Their Causes and Conse- quences [ J ]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988, 2(1): 21-48. 被引量:1
  • 3JARRELL G A, BRICKLEY J A, NETTER J M. The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980[J ]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988, 2(1): 49-68. 被引量:1
  • 4MANNE H G. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1965, 73 (2) : 110- 120. 被引量:1
  • 5DICKERSON A P, GIB')N H D, TSAKALOTOS E. Takeover Risk and the Market for Corporate Control: The Experience of British Firms in the 1970s and 1980s [J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20(8): 1167 1195. 被引量:1
  • 6TSAGKANO8 A, GEORGOtK)UI.)8 A, SIRIOPOULO8 C. Predicting Takeover Targets :New Evidence from a Small Otxm Econmay[ J ]. International Research Journal of Fi- nance and Eeornmics,2006, (4) : 183 - 192. 被引量:1
  • 7PALEPU K G. Predicting Takeover Targets: A Methodological and Empirical Analysis[J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1986, (8) : 3 - 35. 被引量:1
  • 8BARNES P. The Identification of UK Takeover Tar- gets Using Published Historical Cost Accounting Data. Some Empirical Evidence Comparing Logit with Linear Discriminant Analysis and Raw Financial Ratios with Industry-Relative Ratios [ J ]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2000, 9(2): 147 162. 被引量:1
  • 9BRAR G, GIAMOURIDIS D, LIODAKIS M. Predict- ing European Takeover Targets[J ]. European Financial Management, 2009, 15(2): 430-450. 被引量:1
  • 10MORCK R, SHLEIFER A, VISHNY R W. Alterna- tive Mechanisms for Corporate Control[J ]. American Economic Review, 1989,79(4): 842 852. 被引量:1

二级参考文献70

共引文献138

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部