期刊文献+

跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴关系监管议题谈判前景分析 被引量:1

The Prospect of TTIP Negotiation on Regulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在世界贸易组织(WTO)陷入多边立法困境的背景下,美欧进行的跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴关系(TTIP)新一代贸易规则谈判引人关注。本文从双层博弈视角分析了TTIP监管议题谈判的前景,认为谈判虽然面临诸多挑战,但双方在常规性合作机制和已有共识基础上达成监管协议的可能性是存在的。监管议题更大的挑战将出现在美欧各自的议会批准环节,其中以美国的挑战最为突出。在TTIP谈判期限内,奥巴马总统得到国会贸易促进授权的前景不容乐观,即使美欧达成TTIP监管协议,该协议在国会批准环节也充满变数。 Against the background of rule-making dilemma at WTO,the ongoing TTIP negotiation between the U.S.and EU attracts the attention of the world.Any agreement reached within TTIP may have far-reaching impact on international trade law.Regulation is one of the three major areas of TTIP negotiation,covering topics from TBTPLUS,SPS-PLUS to horizontal regulation rules.Focusing on the prospect of TTIP negotiation on regulation,this paper argues that,EU and the U.S.,have reached certain consensus through routine regulatory cooperation.Therefore,it is possible that EU and the U.S.may reach an agreement on regulation issues.However,congress,especially the U.S.congress poses great challenge to any potential agreements.A majority of Democrats,who advocate more power for congress in new-generation-FTA negotiation,are generally against TPA.American people are skeptical toward the outcome of existing FTAs.President Obama is facing great uncertainty in getting TPA,which casts a shadow on the success of TTIP regulatory negotiation.
作者 陈若鸿
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期53-57,81,共5页 International Forum
基金 北京外国语大学中国文化"走出去"协同创新中心项目资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Robert Putnam, "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization", In- ternational Organization, 1988, Vol.42 No.3, pp. 427--460. 被引量:1
  • 2Karel De Gucht, "Speech-Transatlantic Trade and Invest- mentPartnership (TTIP)-Solving the Regulatory Puzzle", Europa PressRelease, SPEECH/13/801, 10 October 2013. 被引量:1
  • 3Charan Deveraux, Robert Lawrence and Michael Watkins, "the US-EU Mutual recognition Agreements", Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation, 2006, Vol 1 : Making the Rules. 被引量:1
  • 4Karel De Gucht,"Towards the Transatlantic Trade and Invest- ment Partnership: Stepping up a Gear", http://europa, eu/ rapid/press-release_ SPEECH-14-140 _ en. htm,访问日期:2014年2月25日. 被引量:1
  • 5Suparna Karmakar, "Prospects for Regulatory Convergence Under TRIP", http: www.bruegel.org,访问日期:2014年1月16日. 被引量:1
  • 6EU-US Regulatory Cooperation Best Cooperative Practice, http://trade, ec. europa, eu/doclib/docs/2006/july/tradoc129223.pdf,访问日期:2014年2月20日. 被引量:1
  • 7United States -European Commission High -Level Regulatory Cooperation Forum Common Understanding on Regulatory Principles and Best Practices, http://www.whitehouse.gov/ sites/default/files/omb/oira/irc/common-understanding-on- regulatory-principles-and-best-practices, pdf, 访问日期:2014年3月4日. 被引量:1
  • 8"Fast Track/Trade Promotion Authority", http://www.iie. com/publications/chapters_ preview/392/05iie3624, pd f, 访问日期:2013年8月9日. 被引量:1
  • 9Delauro, "Miller Lead 151 House Dems Telling President They will not support Outdated Fast Track for Trans-Pacific Partership', http://delauro, house, gov/index, php? option = corn_ content&view = articlakid = 1455: delauro-miller- lead- 151-house-dems-telling-president-they-will-not-support- outdated- fast-track- for-trans-paci fic-parmershipMtemid21,访问日期:2014年4月6日. 被引量:1
  • 10DSWright, "Majority Leader Reid Pushes Back On President Obama's Push For TPP And TTIP', http.//news. firedoglake, com/2014 /01/30 /majofity-leader-reid-pushes- back-on-president-obamas-push-for-tpp-and-ttip/, 访问日期:2014年4月4日. 被引量:1

二级参考文献50

  • 1李卓,刘建兵.论美国贸易调整援助计划[J].经济评论,2005(4):102-105. 被引量:9
  • 2杨树明,陈功.美国对外贸易法中“贸易促进权”模式探析[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2005,45(5):37-41. 被引量:9
  • 3Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal, "The Polarization of American Politics," Journal of Politics, Vol. 46, No. 4, 1984, pp. 1061-1079. 被引量:1
  • 4Barbara Sinclair, Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of Mational Policy Making; Nolan M. McCarty, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal, Polarized America : The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 5Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, ed. , Polarized Politics : Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 6www. voteview. com. 被引量:2
  • 7V. O. Kcy, Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, New York: Crowell, 1942. 被引量:1
  • 8Southern Politics in State and Nation, New York: Knopf, 1949. 被引量:1
  • 9Julius Turner (reviscd by Edward V. Schneider, Jr. ), Party and Constituency: Pressure on Congress, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1970, chapter 6. 被引量:1
  • 10Richard Franklin Bensel, Sectionalism and American Political Development: 1880--1980, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984, Chapters 5, 7-8. 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部