期刊文献+

具有公平感的零售商订购决策研究 被引量:8

Fairness' s Influences to the Retailer's Ordering Decision
原文传递
导出
摘要 供应链系统中,零售商的公平感知会对其订购决策产生影响。将公平感细分为四类:过程双边公平、结果双边公平、过程单边公平和结果单边公平,研究了具有不同公平感类型的零售商在批发价合同下的订购决策。第一,在批发价合同中,具有过程或结果双边公平感的零售商,其订购量各不相同,与不考虑公平感的零售商的相对大小关系取决于系统参数;并且,零售商的公平感无法协调系统,但在某些条件下,可以改善其在系统中的相对收益。第二,在批发价合同中,具有过程或结果单边公平感的零售商,若零售商关注过程单边公平,其订购量总小于不具有公平感的零售商的;若零售商关注结果单边公平,在某些条件下,其订购量大于不具有公平感的零售商的;并且,零售商的公平感无法协调系统,但在某些条件下,可以改善其在系统中的相对收益。 The retailer's fairness concerning influences the ordering decision in the supply chain. Types of fairness are divided as: two-sides process fairness, two-sides outcome fairness, one-side process fairness and one-slde outcome fairness. In this paper, how fairness concerning influences the retailer's optimal orde- ring decisions under wholesale price contract is investigated. Firstly, given the wholesale price contract, when the retailer concerns about two-sides fairness, the optimal ordering decision under process fairness is different from that under outcome fairness. The comparison of the optimal ordering decisions between that with fairness concerning and that without depends on the system's parameters. His fairness concerning cannot coordinate the supply chain, but it can improve his relative profits under some conditions. Second- ly, given the wholesale price contract, when the retailer concerns about one-side fairness, the optimal or- dering decision with process fairness is smaller than that without and the optimal ordering decision with outcome fairness is larger than that without under some conditions. His fairness concerning cannot coordi- nate the supply chain, but he can improve his relative profits under some conditions.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期90-99,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271111 70802041 71071071)
关键词 过程双边公平 结果双边公平 过程单边公平 结果单边公平 two-sides process fairness two-sides outcome fairness one-side process fairness one-side out- come fairness
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining[J]. Journal of Eco- nomic Behavior & Organization, 1982, 4(3) : 367-388. 被引量:1
  • 2Berg J, Dickaut J, McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity and social history[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1995, 10: 122-42. 被引量:1
  • 3Kahneman D, Knetseh J L, Thaler R H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, 59: 285-300. 被引量:1
  • 4每台ipad苹果劲赚150美元,中国工人工资仅8美元[EB/OL].[2012-02-15].环球网:http://www.huan-qiu.com/roll/2012-02/2440233.html. 被引量:1
  • 5Fehr E, Schmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999,114: 817-868. 被引量:1
  • 6Bolton G E, Ockenfels A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition[J]. The American Economic Review, 2000, 90(1): 166-193. 被引量:1
  • 7Charness G, Rabin M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002,117(3): 817-869. 被引量:1
  • 8Loch C H, Wu Yaozhong. Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study[J]. Manage- ment Science, 2008, 54(11): 1835-1849. 被引量:1
  • 9Pavlov V, Katok E. Fairness and coordination failures in supply chain[R]. Working paper, The Pennsylvania State University,2010. 被引量:1
  • 10Thibaut J W, Walker L. Procedural justice: A psycho- logical analysis [M]. New York: L. Erbaum Associ- ates, 1975. 被引量:1

二级参考文献21

共引文献297

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部