期刊文献+

全球供应链下要素禀赋理论的发展——基于钢铁行业的投入产出实证分析 被引量:3

Development of Factor Endowment Theory Based on Global Supply Chain——An Input-output Analysis of the Steel Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在全球供应链生产的背景下,产品内分工和要素跨国流动成为生产和贸易的基本特征。以钢材贸易为例,基于产品内分工和要素跨国流动的视角,扩展经典的要素禀赋理论,选取1987—2010年的数据,采用投入产出分析法进行实证分析,并进行残差检验和格兰杰因果检验。研究结果表明:可获得的要素禀赋,是一国参与产品内分工的关键。发展中国家,一方面,可以参与高附加值产业的劳动密集型生产环节,实现价值链的攀升;另一方面,可以积累资源,改变自身的要素禀赋特征,实现价值链的跳跃。 In the context of global supply chain, intra-product speciahzatlon ancl elements of transnational movement have become essential features of production and trade. From the perspectives of intra-product specialization and elements of transnational movement, a case study in the steel trade, based on 1987-2010 data, was done to expand the classic theory of factor endowment by applying the input-output analysis, the residual test and Granger causality test. Its findings show that the factor endowment available serves as the key to a country's participation in the intra-product specialization. The developing countries, on the one hand, could realize value chain climbing through involvement in the labor-intensive sections of high value-added industries. On the other hand, they could fulfill value chain leaping by accumulating resources and adjusting the characteristics of factor endowment.
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期474-479,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般资助项目(W2014042) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年资助项目(L13CGJ011)
关键词 要素禀赋理论 产品内分工 要素跨国流动 投入产出分析 factor endowment theory intra-product specialization element of transnational movement input-output analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ohlin B G. Interregional and International Trade[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933 : 75 - 98. 被引量:1
  • 2Leontief W. Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined[J]. Proceedings of the Araerecan Philosophical Society, 1953,97(4):332 - 349. 被引量:1
  • 3Minhas B. International Comparison of Factor Costs and Factor Utilization [ M]. Amsterdam: North Netherlands Publishing Company, 1963. 被引量:1
  • 4Vanek J. The Factor Proportions Theory: The N-factor Case[J]. Kyklos, 1968,21 : 749 - 754. 被引量:1
  • 5Casas R. The Leontief Paradox: Continued or Resolved [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93 (7): 610 -615. 被引量:1
  • 6Trefler D. International Factor Price Differences: Leontief Was Right! [,J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993,101 (6) 1961 - 987. 被引量:1
  • 7Estevadeordal A, Taylor M. A Century of Missing Trade?[J]. American Economic Review, 2002,92(1) ,383 -393. 被引量:1
  • 8Helleiner G K. Manufactured Exports ftom Less- developed Countries and Multinational Firms[J]. The Economic Journal, 1973,83(329) :21 - 47. 被引量:1
  • 9Deardorff A V. Fragmentation in Simple Trade Model [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2001(12) :121 - 128. 被引量:1
  • 10卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004,4(1):55-82. 被引量:233

共引文献517

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部