摘要
最高法院公布的劳动争议案由的类、种和亚种相对简单,无法容纳实践中大量具有可诉性、可类型化的劳动争议。资方违法行为确认之诉,在案由、诉因和诉种层面具有特殊性和独立性,应成为法定案由体系中的新案由、劳动司法实践中的新诉种。此类确认之诉可单独提起,也可与给付之诉、形成之诉合并提起。该新案由、诉种使相关纠纷得以程序化、机制化、法治化地处理,对于警示、对抗、约束资方违法侵权和遏制权利争议,具有显著功能;对于维权乏术、绩效欠佳、公信力不足的地方工会,具有特别的工具价值。
The categories, types and sub-types of labour disputes promulgated by the Supreme Court are relatively simple, which can completely cover all suable and typifying labour disputes in practice. Litigation of confirmation on illegal actions of the employer holds specialty and independency in the terms of causes for action, suing reasons and category. It should become the new causes for action in the system of legal causes for action, as well as the new category in judiciary on labour cases. It can be raised separately, or being combined with sue for payment and formation. It could be conducive to the labour dispute resolved in a legally procedural mechanism. It also prominently matters to alert, struggle and constrain illegal actions of the employer. The trade union without competency, efficiency and legitimacy in defending workers＇ rights can also benefit from it.
出处
《中国人力资源开发》
北大核心
2014年第14期105-108,共4页
Human Resources Development of China
基金
国家社科基金项目"我国劳动关系多元转型的法治化调整机制研究"(14BFX181)
中国人权研究会<中国劳动者社会保障权利存在的问题和改善建议>(资政课题)的资助
关键词
确认之诉
案由
诉种
工会
Litigation of Confirmation
Causes for Action
Category of Litigation
Trade Union
