摘要
随着国际贸易自由化和环境保护全球化趋势的不断增强,国际社会对环境与贸易的关系日益关注,各种环境保护公约不断频现,许多环境公约采取贸易措施作为实现环保目标的方法,从而与世界贸易组织可能产生冲突。对于同属多边环境公约和世界贸易组织的成员方之间的争端,可以根据条约法公约关于条约之间冲突的解决方法来确定优先次序;若双方都属于世界贸易组织成员,而一方不是多边环境公约成员国,则只能使用WTO争端解决机制,但争端解决机构在解释WTO相关条文时,应尽可能采取与多边环境协定不相冲突的解释。
With the trends of international trade liberalization and global environmental protection, the international community.has become increasingly concerned about the relationship between environment and trade, and various environmental conventions continue to be concluded, which taking trade measures as a way to achieve environmental goals. The result is that MTEAs and WTO may generate conflicts. Disputes between members of MTEAs and WTO can be determined in accordance with the rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to solve prioritization. If both sides are WTO members, of which one member is not multilateral environmental conventions, disputes between them can only be resolved by the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. In the interpretation of the relevant provisions of WTO, DSB should take the explain which does not conflict with MTEAs as much as possible.
出处
《生态经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第8期68-71,共4页
Ecological Economy
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目"世界贸易组织与区域贸易协定间争端解决机制管辖权冲突与调和研究"(13CFX116)
