期刊文献+

肿瘤标志物在胰腺囊性肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值 被引量:2

Clinical diagnostic value of tumor markers in distinguishing malignant from benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和总胆红素(TB)联合检测在胰腺囊性肿瘤良恶性鉴别中的临床诊断与应用价值。方法选取2015年1月至2017年1月间陕西省宝鸡市人民医院收治的116例胰腺囊性肿瘤患者,分别行血清CA19-9、CEA和TB检测,以病理学检查结果进行分组,将106例恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者纳入恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤组; 10例良性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者纳入良性胰腺囊性肿瘤组。比较两组患者的肿瘤标志物水平,并计算CA19-9、CEA和TB单独检测与CA19-9、CEA和TB联合检测恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤的阳性率、敏感性、准确性和特异性。结果恶性囊胰腺囊性肿瘤患者血清CA19-9、CEA和TB水平均显著高于良性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者; CA19-9、CEA和TB单独检测恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤阳性率均显著低于三组联合检测的阳性率,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。CA19-9、CEA和TB联合检测恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤的灵敏度与准确度均显著高于CA19-9、CEA和TB单独检测,差异均有统计学意义(均P <0. 05)。CA19-9、CEA和TB联合检测恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤的特异性与CA19-9、CEA和TB单独检测的特异性无显著差异,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论 CA19-9、CEA和TB联合诊断可显著提升恶性胰腺囊性肿瘤的确诊率,值得在胰腺囊性肿瘤良恶性的鉴别诊断中应用推广。 Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic value and clinical application value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9( CA19-9),carcinoembryonic antigen( CEA) and total bilirubin( TB) in distinguishing malignant from benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Method A total of 116 patients with pancreatic cystic tumors treated at Baoji People’s Hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were selected. Serum detection of CA19-9,CEA and TB was performed. They were divided into groups according the pathological findings. One hundred and six patients with malignant pancreatic cystic neoplasms were assigned to malignant pancreatic cystic neoplasms group and 10 with benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms were assigned to benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms group. The levels of tumor markers were compared between the two groups.The positive rate,sensitivity,accuracy and specificity for malignant pancreatic cystic tumors were compared between CA19-9,CEA,TB single detection and combination detection. Results The serum levels of CA19-9,CEA and TB were significantly higher in patients with malignant cystic pancreatic tumors than in patients with benign cystic pancreatic tumors( all P < 0. 05). The positive rates of patients with malignant cystic pancreatic tumors were significantly lower for CA19-9,CEA and TB single detection than for the combined detection of three indicators( all P < 0. 05). The sensitivity and accuracy of CA19-9,CEA and TB combined detection were significantly higher than those of CA19-9,CEA and TB single detection( all P <0. 05). There was no significantly different in specificity between combined detection of CA19-9,CEA and TB and CA19-9,CEA and TB single detection for malignant pancreatic cystic tumors( P > 0. 05). Conclusion CA19-9,CEA and TB combined diagnosis can significantly improve the diagnostic rate for malignant pancreatic cystic tumors. It was worth popularizing in distinguishing malignant from benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms.
作者 张小博 李海英 王顺 ZHANG Xiao-bo;LI Hai-ying;WANG Shun(Clinical Laboratory,Baoji People's Hospital,Baoji 721001,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2019年第1期46-49,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
基金 陕西省自然科学研究计划(2016jm3364)
关键词 糖类抗原19-9 癌胚抗原 总胆红素 准确度 特异性 Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 Carcinoembryonic antigen Total bilirubin Accuracy Specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献63

  • 1Liao, Quan,Zhao, Yu-Pei,Yang, Ying-Chi,Li, Li-Jun,Long, Xiao,Han, Shao-Mei.Combined detection of serum tumor markers for differential diagnosis of solid lesions located at the pancreatic head[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2007,6(6):641-645. 被引量:27
  • 2Ubukata H, Katano M, Motohashi G, et al. Evaluation of CA72-4 as a tumor marker in patients with gastric cancer [J]. Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2003,30( 11 ) : 1821-1824. 被引量:1
  • 3Ni XG, Bai XF, Mao YL, et al. The clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer [J]. EJSO,2005,31(2) : 164-169. 被引量:1
  • 4Ucar E, Semerci E, Ustun H, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer[J]. Adv Ther, 2008,25 (10) : 1075-1084. 被引量:1
  • 5朱汉民,沈霞.临床实验诊断学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版卡t,2004:918-934. 被引量:1
  • 6Chen XZ, Zhang WK, Yang K. Correlation between serum CA72-4 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population [J]. Mol Biol Rep,2012,39(9) :9031-9039. 被引量:1
  • 7Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, et al. Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2002, 49(46) : 1157-1160. 被引量:1
  • 8Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al.lneidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large num- ber of cases at two large centers [J].Gastric Cancer, 2000, 3 (4) : 219-225. 被引量:1
  • 9陈创,陈利琴,杨国梁,李雁.肿瘤标志物在结直肠癌诊断和监测中的价值和改进策略:130例患者的临床资料分析(英文)[J].癌症,2007,26(11):1221-1226. 被引量:33
  • 10Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al.Cancer statistics,2010[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2012,60(5):277-300. 被引量:1

共引文献96

同被引文献19

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部