期刊文献+

四川省基层医院急诊医务人员培训现状调查与需求分析 被引量:14

Investigation and demand analysis of training status of emergency personnel in primary hospitals in Sichuan Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解四川省基层医院急诊培训现状,发现薄弱环节,为科学开展急诊知识和技能培训提供依据。方法采用随机抽样法及匿名问卷调查法,对四川省9个地区1000名急诊医务人员基本情况、目前培训情况、培训需求展开调查。采用Excel软件对数据进行整理,SPSS17.0软件对数据进行分析。结果本次调查范围覆盖三级、二级及二级以下医院的急诊科医生、护士、技师,总共发出问答1000份,回收983份,问卷回收率达98.3%。被调查人员主要以工作时长达10年以上,本科学历,初、中级职称为主。大部分人每年只有1~2次参加培训的机会(63.1%,620人),参加培训的方式主要为,继续教育(59.0%,580人次)、单位内组织的培训(58.5%,575人次)、卫生行政单位组织的培训(39.3%,386人次)。培训的内容主要有,基础专业技能学习(66.7%,655人次)、基础专业理论学习(59.2%,582人次)、急诊新技术学习(42.5%,418人次)。只有32.0%(314人)的人员认为现阶段的培训基本能满足实际工作需求。导致他们参加培训次数少的因素主要有,单位不安排(36.2%,356人次)、培训与实际工作有差别(31.6%,311人次)、工作无人接替(29.8%,293人次)。其最希望培训的方式是实践操作(60.1%,591人次),最希望的培训内容是急诊急救知识(73.7%,724人次)。不同级别医院在病例讨论、技术观摩、学术讲座、专题学习培训、学习方式的选择差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在对专业实践方式的选择差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而对培训内容的选择在急诊急救知识、全科医学知识、慢性病防治知识、传染病知识、科室管理知识培训内容的选择差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。而在对护理知识进行培训的选择差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论四川省基层急诊医务人员缺乏急救知识技能培训的现状无法满足其参加培训愿望的需求,制定一个规范、系统、科学的培训模式,提高 Objective To get well-informed of the current status of emergency training in primary hospitals in Sichuan Province and to find weaknesses in the system in order to provide scientific basis for emergency knowledge and skills training. Methods A stratified random cluster sampling method as adopted and an anonymous questionnaire survey method was conducted to investigate the basic circumstances of the current training and the training needs of 1 000 emergency medical staff in 9 regions throughout Sichuan Province. Results The scope of the survey covered emergency doctors, nurses and technicians in hospitals of Grade Ⅱ, Grade Ⅲ and below. A total of 1 000 surveys were sent out and 983 were recovered. The questionnaire completion rate was 98.3%. The respondents mainly worked for more than 10 years, most of which with Bachelor degree, junior and intermediate titles. Results of the survey showed, 63.1% Most respondents have only one or two training opportunities per year. The training methods are mainly continuing education (59.0%, 580 trips), training organized within the unit (58.5%, 575 trips), and training organized by health administrative units (39.3%, 386 trips). The main contents of the training are: basic professional skills learning (66.7%, 655 trips), basic professional theoretical study (59.2%, 582 trips), and new emergency technology (42.5%, 418 trips). only 32.0% of the respondents believe that these methods meet the practical needs. The main factors that influence participation in the training were: not be arranged by employer (36.2%, 356 trips);the training was different from actual work (31.6%, 311 trips);no replacement for work so they couldn't join training (29.8%, 293 trips). The survey showed that the most desirable way of training is: practical application (60.1%, 591 trips) and the most desirable training content is: emergency first aid knowledge (73.7%, 724 trips). There were significant differences in case discussion, technical observation, academic lectures, special study training and lear
作者 江朋 韩存巧 何亚荣 唐时元 周亚雄 胡俊飞 曹钰 Jiang Peng;Han Cunqiao;He Yarong;Tang Shiyuan;Zhou Yaxiong;Hu Junfei;Cao Yu(Department of Emergency,WestChina Hospital of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2019年第1期101-106,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
关键词 基层医院 急诊医务人员 培训 需求 Primary hospital Emergency medical staff Training Demand
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献55

共引文献86

同被引文献130

引证文献14

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部