期刊文献+

全模型迭代重组联合低管电压技术的肠系膜上动脉CT血管造影图像质量评价 被引量:5

Evaluation of the Quality of CT Angiography in the Superior Mesenteric Artery of the Iterative Model Reconstruction Combined with Low Tube Voltage Technique
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨全模型迭代重组(IMR)联合低管电压(kV)技术在肠系膜上动脉(SMA)CT血管造影(CTA)中对降低辐射剂量及控制图像质量的应用价值。方法将60例行腹盆腔动态CT增强扫描的患者随机分为常规组(120 kV)和低剂量组(80kV),每组30例。根据重组算法将常规组分为A、B两组,低剂量组为C组。A组采用120 kV,i Dose^4重组;B组采用120 kV,IMR重组;C组采用80 kV,IMR重组,余参数均一致。常规组与低剂量组年龄、体质指数(BMI)、用碘总量、有效辐射剂量(ED)比较使用独立样本t检验;A、B、C三组间SMA血管强化CT值、噪声(SD)、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)及SMA图像质量评分比较使用单因素方差分析。结果常规组与低剂量组的年龄、BMI和用碘总量无显著性差异(P >0.05)。常规组和低剂量组的ED分别为(7.2±1.6)m Sv和(2.3±0.5)m Sv,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。A、B、C三组的SMA血管强化CT值分别为(311.3±48.2)HU、(333.0±47.9)HU和(487.6±75.1)HU,A、B两组间差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),余组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);三组SD值分别为(33.3±4.8)HU、(11.2±1.1)HU和(18.4±2.3)HU,三组间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);三组CNR、SNR分别为(10.2±2.4)、(11.0±2.8),(30.2±5.7)、(32.2±7.6),(26.9±5.0)、(34.8±7.4),B、C两组间差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),余组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);三组SMA-CTA图像质量评分分别为(2.4±0.4)分、(3.1±0.3)分和(3.6±0.3)分,三组间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论低kV-CT扫描联合IMR重组技术不仅显著降低CT辐射剂量,而且可以降低图像噪声,提高图像质量及SMA远端血管的显示率。 Objective To evaluate the application of iterative model reconstruction(IMR)combined with low tube voltage in superior mesenteric artery CT angiography(CTA)for reducing radiation dose and controlling image quality.Methods 60 cases of abdominal and pelvic enhancement CT scans were randomly divided into standard dose group and low dose group,standard dose group assigned to group A、B according to different reconstruction algorithms,low dose group regarded as group C.group A(n=30,120 kV and i Dose^4reconstruction),group B(n=30,120 kV and IMR reconstruction),group C(n=30,80 kV and IMR reconstruction),while the other parameters kept consistent.We compared the age,BMI,iodine consumption amount,effective dose(ED)of standard dose group and low dose group with independent-sample t test.We also compared the artery CT value,image noise(SD),signal noise ratio(SNR),contrast noise ratio(CNR)and superior mesenteric artery image quality with one-way analysis of variance.ResultsThe difference of age,BMI,iodine consumption quantity between standard dose group and low dose group had no statistic significance(P >0.05).The ED of standard dose group and low dose group were(7.2±1.6)m Sv,(2.3±0.5)m Sv,The difference of data had statistic significance(P<0.01).The CT value of SMA among group A,B and C were(311.3±48.2)HU,(333.0±47.9)HU and(487.6±75.1)HU,there had no statistic significance among group A and B(P >0.05),whereas the data difference for the rest groups had statistical significance(P<0.01).SD were(33.3±4.8)HU,(11.2±1.1)HU and(18.4±2.3)HU,The difference among the three groups had statistical significance(P<0.01).SNR、CNR were(10.2±2.4),(11.0±2.8);(30.2±5.7),(32.2±7.6);(26.9±5.0),(34.8±7.4);they had no statistic significance among group B and C(P >0.05),whereas the data difference for the rest of the groups had statistical significance(P<0.01).The CT angiography of superior mesenteric artery image quality were(2.4±0.4),(3.1±0.3),(3.6±0.3),the difference of data among three groups had statistical significance(P<0
作者 刘晨晨 龚建平 徐梦琴 蔡武 窦欣 张云 乔方 LIU Chenchen;GONG Jianping;XU Mengqin(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu Province 215004,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第12期2100-2103,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 血管造影术 辐射剂量 Tomography,X-ray computed Angiography Radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1Bae KT,Seeck BA,Hildetbolt CF,et al.Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT:effect of body weight,height,body surface area,body mass index,and obesity.A JR Am J Roentgenol,2008,190:777-784. 被引量:1
  • 2Wintersperger B,Jakohs T,Herzog P,et al.Aorto-iliac maltidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings:improved vessel enhancement and simaltaneous reduction of radiation dose.Eur Radiol,2005,15:334-341. 被引量:1
  • 3Bardo DM,Asamato J,Mackay CS,et al.Low-dose coronary artery computed tomography angiogram of an infant with tetralogy of fallot using a 256-slice multidetector computed tomography scanner.Pediatr Cardiol,2009,30:824-826. 被引量:1
  • 4Huda W,Scalzetti EM,Levin G.Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.Radiology,2000,217:430-435. 被引量:1
  • 5Ertl-Wagner BB,Hoffmann RT,Bruning R,et al.Multi-detector row CT angiography of the hrain at various kilovoltage settings.Radiology,2004,231:528-535. 被引量:1
  • 6Bahner ML,Bengel A,Brix G,et al.Improved vascular opacification in cerebral computed tomography angiography with 80 kVp.Invest Radiol,2005,40:229-234. 被引量:1
  • 7Zatz LM.The effect of the kVp level on EMI values:selective imaging of various materials with different kVp settings.Radiology,1976,119:683-688. 被引量:1
  • 8Brenner D J, Hall EJ. Computed tomography- an increasing source of radiation exposure[J].N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(22): 2277-2284. 被引量:1
  • 9Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience[J].J Comput Assist Tomogx, 2010, 34(1):40-45. 被引量:1
  • 10Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L,MtillerHC, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal muhidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study[J]. Radiology, 2011,260(2):454-462. 被引量:1

共引文献90

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部