期刊文献+

海上大功率风力机固定式支撑结构方案比较分析 被引量:5

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BOTTOM-FIXED SUPPORTS OF LARGE-CAPACITY OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于大功率的海上风力机(OWTs)的动力特性约束,优化确定不同水深范围内柔性、刚柔性及刚性设计方案下3种典型固定式海上风电支撑--单立柱、单立柱三桩和导管架式结构主尺度;进一步分析动力特性可行结构方案相应外环境激励及抗力特征不确定分布下结构强度、刚度性能的可靠度指标。研究结果表明:大功率风力机固定式支撑结构水深拓展到100 m,导管架支撑刚柔性设计为经济可行方案,相应方案的单立柱及单立柱三桩存在过大位移及应力。该方法可用于海上风电支撑结构选型和方案决策。 The paper presents an evaluation method to assess different design schemes of support structures for large-capacity OWT.Monopile supports,tripod supports as well as lattice supports at different water depths up to100m are used as models of optimization based on dynamic excitation of OWT.The reliability properties are calculated by probabilistic design system on account of uncertainty distributions of environmental excitations and structural resistance parameters.According to the research results,the soft-stiff design schemes for fixed OWT supports are economical and feasible compared with soft-soft and stiff-stiff design schemes.Jacket support turns to the best,while there is excessive deflection in monopile support and excessive stress in tripod support.The method would contribute effectively towards selection of different structures and decision of design schemes.
作者 孟珣 刘萌 唐小惠 刘潇涵 Meng Xun;Liu Meng;Tang Xiaohui;Liu Xiaohan(College of Engineering,Ocean University of China,Qingdao266100,China;Ocean Engineering Key Laboratory of Shandong Province,Qingdao266100,China)
出处 《太阳能学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期3215-3223,共9页 Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(51309209) 国家自然科学基金重大项目(51490675)
关键词 海上风力机 结构优化 可靠性分析 固有频率 单立柱支撑 单立柱三桩支撑 导管架式支撑 offshore wind turbines(OWTs) structural optimization reliability analysis natural freqnencies monopile supports tripod supports lattice supports
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1姚兴佳,隋红霞,刘颖明,王晓东.海上风电技术的发展与现状[J].上海电力,2007,20(2):111-118. 被引量:48
  • 2DNV-OS-J101. Design of offshore wind turbine structures [ S ], 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3van der Tempel J, De Vries W, Krolis V, et al. Mangrove findings offshore wind energy in deep waters [ A ]. Proceedings European Offshore Wind [ C ], Berlin, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 4Seidel M. Jacket substructures for the REpower 5M wind turbine [A]. Proceedings European Offshore Wind [C], Berlin, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 5Jonkman J, Butterfield S. Offshore code comparison collaboration within IEA wind annex XXIII: Phase II results regarding monopile foundation modeling [A]. IEA European Offshore Wind Conference[C], Berlin, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 6Zaaijer M B. Foundation modelling to assess dynamic behavior of offshore wind turbines[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2006, 28(1): 45-57. 被引量:1
  • 7Schaumann P, Boker C. Can jackets and tripods compete with monopiles? [A]. Contribution to Copenhagen Offshore Wind [ C ], Lopenhagen, Denmark, 2005, 26-28. 被引量:1
  • 8van der Tempel J, Molenaar D P. Wind turbine structural dynamics-A review of the principles for modern power generation, onshore and offshore[J]. Wind Engineering, 2002, 26(4): 211-220. 被引量:1
  • 9Quarton D. Wind turbines, part 3: Design requirements for offshore wind turbines [ S ]. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 10van der Tempel J. Design of support structures for offshore wind turbines [D]. Delft University of Technology, 2006. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献34

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部