摘要
目的比较、分析聚焦超声与波姆红外线治疗宫颈糜烂的临床效果及安全性。方法选取宫颈糜烂患者180例,随机分为观察组和对照组各90例,观察组采用聚焦超声治疗仪治疗,对照组采用波姆红外线治疗,比较2组临床疗效及治疗后并发症发生情况。结果观察组治疗总有效率为100.0%,明显高于对照组的95.6%,2组均未出现宫颈内膜增生、宫颈结痂及宫颈瘢痕等并发症,观察组宫颈管狭窄发生率及复发率明显低于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论聚焦超声治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效明显高于波姆红外线治疗,可有效降低治疗后并发症发生率,帮助患者尽快康复,具有无创、不良反应低、高效、安全等优点,对于未生育妇女尤其适用。
Objective comparative analysis for cervical erosion were treated with focused ultrasound therapy and Bo-hm infrared ray in the treatment of the clinical effect and safety. Methods 180 cases of cervical erosion were treated were se-lected as the research object,and were randomly divided into observation group（ take focused ultrasound therapy）and control group（ take the Bohm infrared therapy）,the two groups were observed in patients with clinical efficacy and complications situ-ation. Results the patients in the observation group the total effective rate of treatment（100%）was significantly higher than the control group（95. 6%）,cervical endometrial hyperplasia,cervical scar and cervical scar were not occurred in patients in the two groups,the observation group occurred in patients with cervical stenosis and recurrence was significantly lower than the control group,the differences were statistically significant（P〈0. 05）. Conclusion the clinical efficacy of focused ultrasound therapy for the treatment of cervical erosion was significantly higher than that of Bohm infrared therapy,can effectively reduce the incidence rate of complications after treatment,help the patients to recover as soon as possible,has the advantages of non-invasive,low adverse reaction,high efficiency,safety,especially suitable for women without children.
出处
《临床合理用药杂志》
2014年第17期27-28,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词
聚焦超声
红外线
宫颈糜烂
临床疗效
对比分析
focused ultrasound
infrared ray
cervical erosion
clinical curative effect
comparative analysis
