摘要
目的比较子宫颈电环切术(LEEP刀)与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效。方法将确诊为宫颈糜烂的300例患者,随机分成两组,每组150例,Leep刀组采用Wallach高频手术器切割病变组织,微波组采用微波治疗仪烧灼病灶,比较两组手术时间、术中失血量和治愈率。结果两组术中出血量无显著性差异(P>0.05),Leep刀组手术时间较微波组为短,差异有显著性(P<0.05),Leep刀组的治愈率明显高于微波组(P<0.05)。结论 Leep刀治疗重度宫颈糜烂操作简单,安全可靠,效果优于微波治疗,值得临床应用。
To compare the curative effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure （LEEP） and mi- crowave in the treatment of cervical erosion. [Methods] 300 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into two groups with average 150 cases： pathological tissues were dissected with Wallach high frequency electro sur- gical unit in Leep knife group while were cauterized.with microwave treatment facility in microwave group. A com- parison was performed between the two groups in operative duration, intraoperative blood loss and recovery rate. [ Results ] There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between Leep knife group and microwave group （P 〉0.05）. The operative duration in Leep knife group was statistically shorter than that in microwave group （P 〈0.05）.The recovery rate in Leep knife group was significantly higher than that in microwave group（P 〈0.05）. [ Con- clusion] Leep knife deserves being applied for severe cervical erosion due to its advantages such as simple tech- nique, safety, reliability and more excellent effect than microwave therapy.
出处
《中国现代医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第18期91-93,共3页
China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词
宫颈糜烂
LEEP刀
微波
cervical erosion
Leep knife
microwave
