摘要
新刑诉法通过强化庭审法官主导地位、恢复卷宗移送方式和边缘化辩护职能等方式,朝着审问模式回归,然而在庭审制度上确向控辩模式演变。进退之间使人对法官能否保持中立、检察官能否履行客观义、辩护人能否有效辩护产生质疑。应避免法官庭前预断、建立判决理由论证制度来确保法官中立;构建证据展示制度、赋予检察官变更指控权、建立违反客观义务的制裁措施来明确检察官客观义务;扩大指定辩护范围、提升辩护能力、建立无效辩护制度,促进辩护律师尽职尽责来注重有效辩护,进而完善新刑诉法确立的庭审模式。
The New Criminal Procedure Law exhibits its questioning mode by strengthening the dominant position of the trial judge,restoring the deportation of files and marginalizing defense functions. However,it clearly shows the mode of prosecution and defense in terms of trial system. We should perfect the trial mode of the New Criminal Procedure Law via measures such as the establishment of the judgment reasoning system,construction of the evidence display system,expansion of the designated defense scope,improvement of the defense ability and establishment of the invalid defense system.
出处
《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期40-44,共5页
Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
河南省教育厅人文社科重点项目"新刑事诉讼法实施背景下刑事和解制度研究"(编号:2013-ZD-004)
河南省科技厅软科学项目"中原经济区背景下的河南省刑事和解制度研究"(编号:142400410056)
关键词
庭审模式
法官中立
客观义务
有效辩护
trial mode
neutrality of the judge
objective obligation
effective defense
