摘要
胡伊青加的游戏观一直处于褒贬不一的争议之中。从他对原初游戏的描述到游戏与知识关系的界定都体现了他将游戏定位于人类文明的核心和主导地位的观点,而Carlon等人尖锐地批评了胡伊青加将游戏泛化的做法,认为应当在概念上区分玩耍和游戏。通过引入当代哲学认识论对知识概念研究的深化,发现胡伊青加的游戏观和后人对其的批判都蕴涵了对知识概念相同的定义,即知识就是一种言述知识。而随着波兰尼和后期维特根斯坦对知识概念研究的深入,发现知识包含着言述和默会这两个维度。借此就能化解在胡伊青加游戏观中存在的逻辑上的断裂,能够包容Carlon等人对胡伊青加所提出的批判,使胡伊青加的泛化游戏观得到更为宽泛的包容性和解释力。
The analysis of Huizinga on play is always in controversy. From his description on primitive play to the identification on the relationship between play and knowledge, he placed the conception of play in the central and as the nature of human civilization. However, contemporary researchers, like Carlon criticize the generalized conception of play of Huizinga, and insist that we should distinguish play and game conceptually. Under the development of contemporary epis- temology, it is noticed that the analysis of Huizinga on play and his critic share the some concep- tion of knowledge, an articulated knowledge. Along with Polanyi＇s and Post--Wittgensteinian＇s researching, the different dimensions-articulate and tacit-have been found, whereby we can defuse the logical rupture in Huizinga＇ s viewpoint and make the critic of Carlon inclusive, though the analysis of Huizinga on play can improve its inclusivity and capacity of interpretation.
出处
《体育与科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期48-53,共6页
Sports & Science
基金
2012年度国家社会科学基金青年项目<当代哲学认识论视域下的体育运动研究>
项目号:12CTY001
2010年度国家社会科学基金重大项目<中国体育发展方式改革研究>
项目号:10ZD&052
关键词
胡伊青加
游戏
知识论
默会知识
体育本质
体育哲学
竞技运动
Huizinga
play
epistemology
tacit knowing
nature of sport
sport philosophy
competitive sports
