期刊文献+

协商质量的指标化——商谈测量工具综述 被引量:2

Indexing the Deliberative Quality: Review on the Methods for Discourse Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 协商质量的指标化是协商质量的测量工具。斯蒂伯格基于哈贝马斯的商谈伦理设计了第一代商谈质量指标,该指标在"具体指标""测量要素充分性""适用性"以及"可靠性"等方面引起了各方的讨论,在此基础上,研究者又相继发展出了编码方案、主体间理性指标和第二代商谈质量指标。 Indexization of deliberative quality is a method for deliberation measuring .Marco R Steenbergen and his fellows designed the Discourse Quality Index 1.0 based on Habermas's discourse ethics , which aroused a lot of de-bates around the DQI1.0, including the doubt about the credibility of detail indexes , sufficiency, applicability and reliability of DQI1.0 in whole.As a result, researchers developed coding scheme for measuring deliberation's con-tent, intersubjective rationality index and DQI 2.0 as a supplement for DQI1.0.
作者 黄峥
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第2期15-21,共7页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
基金 2011年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(11JZD030) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2013ZZ025)
关键词 协商民主 商谈质量指标 商谈内容编码 主体间理性指标 第二代商谈质量指标 deliberative democracy discourse quality index discourse coding scheme intersubjective rationality in-dex DQI2.0
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1胡锦涛.在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告[N].人民日报,2012-11-18(1). 被引量:143
  • 2Gutmann A, Thompson D. Why Deliberative Democracy-[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Elstub S. The third generation of deliberative democracy[J]. Political Studies Review, 2010, 8(3). 被引量:1
  • 4Young I M. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy[J]. Political theory, 2001, 29(5):670-690. 被引量:1
  • 5Mouffe C. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism-[J]. Social research, 1999, 66(3):745-758. 被引量:1
  • 6Black L W, Burkhalter S, Gastil J, et al. Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation[M]//Bucy E P, Holbert R L. Sourcebook of Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York: Routledge, 2010:323-345. 被引量:1
  • 7Holzinger, Katharina. Verhandeln statt argumentieren oder verhandeln durch argumentieren: eine empirische analyse auf der basis der sprechakttheorie[J] Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2001, 42: 414-446. 被引量:1
  • 8Stromer-Galley J. Measuring deliberation's content: a coding scheme[J]. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2007, 3(1). 被引量:1
  • 9Steenbergen M R, B-chtiger A, Sprndli M, et al. Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index[J]. Comparative European Politics, 2003, 1(1). 被引量:1
  • 10B-chtiger A, Shikano S, Pedrini S, et al. Measuring deliberation 2.0: standards, discourse types, and sequenzialization[C] Potsdam:ECPR General Conference, 2009. 被引量:1

共引文献145

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部