期刊文献+

我国行政诉讼制度现代化的转型问题 被引量:10

On Modernization Transformation of Administrative Procedure System in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化,为我国行政诉讼制度的现代化提供了新的政治基础和重要时代机遇。国家治理体系现代化的法治取向、行政争议解决的司法权威主义和基于公法私法分离的行政诉讼制度构建,是行政诉讼制度向现代化转型的三个基本条件。《行政诉讼法》应当着眼于现代化要求进行系统性修订,而不应当停留在局部性的修补。 The modernization of the state governance system and ability lays new political foundation and important era opportunity for modernization of the administrative procedure system in China. It is held by this paper that the three basic conditions of the administrative procedure system modernization transformation are as follows, the rule of law trend of the state governance system modernization, the judicial authoritarianism of administrative dispute resolution, and the administrative procedure mechanism construction based on the separation of the public and the private law. Basing on these, this paper explores discussion and proposes that the administrative procedure law requires systematical amendment related to the whole modernization needs instead of partial revision.
作者 于安
出处 《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期3-8,共6页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词 国家治理体系现代化 行政诉讼法修订 司法权威主义 Modernization of State Governance System Amendment of Administrative Procedure Law Judicial Authoritarianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献145

  • 1张莉.法国行政诉讼法典化述评[J].法学家,2001(4):118-122. 被引量:11
  • 2Michael C. Doff & Charles F. Sabel, A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism,98 Colum. L. Rev.,第 345 - 48. 被引量:1
  • 3Eekard Rehbinder, Market - Based Incentives for Environmental Protection, in Richard B, Stewart, Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection:Opportunities and Obstacles, in Environmental Law the Economv and Sustainable Development:The United States, the European Union and the International Community 171 (Richard L Revesz, Philippe Sands & Richard B. Stewart eds. ,2000), 第245,248-49页. 被引量:1
  • 4Alfred C. Aman,Jr., The Limits of Globalization and the Future of Administrative Litw: From Government to Governance, 8 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. (2001), 第379 - 380,391页. 被引量:1
  • 5Bruce A. Ackerman and Richard B. Stewart, Reforming Environmental Law, 37 Stan. L. Rev. 1333,1356- 57(1985). 被引量:1
  • 6Lisa Heinzerling, Selling Pollution, Forcing Democracy, 14 Stan. Envfl. L. J. 300,311 - 18 ( 1995 ). 被引量:1
  • 7Stephen G. Brever, Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation( 1993 ). 被引量:1
  • 8Edward W. Warren & Gary E. Marchant,"More Good than Harm":A First Principle for Environmental Agencies and Reviewing Courts,20 Ecology L. Q. 379,438 - 39 (1993). 被引量:1
  • 9Ann - Marie Slaughter, The Accountability of Government Networks. 8 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 347(2001). 被引量:1
  • 10Peter M. Haas. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, 46 Int'l Org. 1 (1992). 被引量:1

共引文献44

同被引文献135

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部