期刊文献+

水气最大密度比对轴流泵空化计算的影响 被引量:6

Effect of the Maximum Density Ratio between Liquid and Vapor on Cavitating Simulation of Axial-flow Pump
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用商业软件CFX的二次开发技术,将滤波器湍流模型(FBM)耦合进软件,并结合均相流空化模型对轴流泵在不同工况下的空化流场进行数值计算,分析了空化模型中的水气最大密度比对轴流泵空化特性计算的影响,并与实验结果进行对比。结果表明:基于RNG k-ε的FBM湍流模型能够较准确地预测轴流泵的外特性;在3种工况下(320、392、480 m3/h),采用真实水气密度比43 197得到的临界汽蚀余量与默认值1 000相比更接近实验值,相对误差分别为1.93%、4.73%和8.09%;随着最大密度比的提高,计算出的空泡面积、空泡含气率和叶顶泄漏涡作用范围也随之增大,这是导致预测的临界汽蚀余量产生差异的原因。 The filter based model (FBM), which was introduced into CFX by user defined subroutine, and a homogeneous cavitation model was used to calculate cavitating flow of the axial-flow pump at different conditions. The effect of a maximum density ratio between liquid and vapor in the cavitation model on cavitation characteristic simulation was investigated. The results compared with experimental data show that the FBM based on RNG k-εmodel can predict the external characteristic of axial flow pump well. The critical NPSHs predicted by the true density ratio 43197 at three different conditions (Q=320, 392, 480m^3/h) are closer to experimental values than the default 1000 and the relative errors are 1.93%, 4.73% and 8.09% respectively. With the increasing of maximum density ratio, the calculated vapor area, vapor volume fraction and the range of tip leakage vortex increase as well. This may be the cause of different predicted critical NPSHs.
出处 《农业机械学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期65-70,共6页 Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51109093) '十二五'国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2011BAF14B01) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
关键词 轴流泵 空化 最大密度比 滤波器模型 Axial-flow pump Cavitation Maximum density ratio Filter-based model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献104

共引文献188

同被引文献63

  • 1甘加业,薛永飞,吴克启.混流泵叶轮内空化流动的数值计算[J].工程热物理学报,2007,28(z1):165-168. 被引量:36
  • 2李文广.全空化模型预测离心泵汽蚀性能的准确度[J].水泵技术,2013(5):1-7. 被引量:9
  • 3吴玉林,吴晓晶,刘树红.水轮机内部涡流与尾水管压力脉动相关性分析[J].水力发电学报,2007,26(5):122-127. 被引量:32
  • 4DELANNOY Y, KUENY J L. Two-phase flow ap- proach in unsteady cavitation modelingFJ~. ASME Cavitation and Multi-Phase Flow Forum, 1990,109: 153-158. 被引量:1
  • 5SINGHAL A K, ATHAVALE M M, LI H. Mathe- matical basis and validation of the full cavitation mod- el [J~. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002,124 (3) . 617-624. 被引量:1
  • 6ZWART P J, GERBER A G, BELAMRI T. A two- phase model for predicting cavitation dynamics I-C]. Fifth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Japan, Yokohama, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 7SCHNERR G H, SAUER J. Physical and numericalmodeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics[-C~. Pro- ceedings of ICMF 2001 International Conference on Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, USA,2001~l-8. 被引量:1
  • 8KUNZ R F, BOGER D A, STINEBRING D R. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction I-J3. Computers ~ Fluids, 2000,29 (8) : 850-872. 被引量:1
  • 9MORGUT M, NOBILE E, BILUS I. Comparsion of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoilEJ~. Interna- tional Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2011,37 (6) : 620- 626. 被引量:1
  • 10COUTIER D O, FORTES P R, REBOUD J. Eval uation of the turbulence model influence on the nu merical simulations of unsteady cavitationFJ~. Jour nal of Fluids Engineering, 2003,125 (1) : 38-45. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部