摘要
当前,中国社会正处于结构性紧张的风险时期。"大调解"与法院司法之间也存在着结构性紧张问题,而时下强化以人民调解和法院调解为主要内容的"大调解",在社会纠纷总量控制方面已经失败。此种结构紧张局面形成的原因在于:立法上,制度供给不足;政治上,过于强调权力的单边治理;观念上,陷入了精英主义的泥潭。按照纠纷解决学之逻辑,破解此种结构紧张的出路在于:从长远看,在顶层设计中,应以法院司法为中心构造中国纠纷解决机制;在近期安排中,法院要坚持保守的司法能动主义,服从并配合党政机构集中资源解决社会纠纷。
At present, China society is in a risk period of comprehensive structural tension. There also exists structural tension between ＂grand mediation＂ and court justice, and nowadays the existing ＂grand mediation＂ which takes the people＇ s mediation and court mediation as its main content has failed to control the total amount of social disputes. The reasons of the structure tension should be attributed to following causes： in legislation field, statutes supply is not enough; in political field, too much emphasis is put on the unilateral governance; in concept field, society fall into a quagmire of elitism. According to the logic of dispute resolution, the only way to break the struc- ture tension lies in： for the long - term planning, we should take the Judicial center principle as the top of future dispute settlement mechanism; and for the recent planning, court should adhere to the conservative principle of judicial activism, and cooperate with the party and government organs to solve social disputes by means of focusing resources.
出处
《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期123-130,共8页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金
2010年教育部人文社会科学青年项目"‘大调解’对中国司法生态的影响--以沪
皖
苏
湘法院调解为实证分析对象"(10YJC820077)
2012年中国法学会部级课题"社会管理创新视域下多元化纠纷解决机制内外协调与整合研究"[CLS(2012)D203]
关键词
“大调解”
结构紧张
人民调解
法院调解
纠纷解决机制
＂grand mediation＂
structural tension
people＇ s mediation
court mediation
dispute settlement mechanism
