期刊文献+

血乳酸、胆碱脂酶与APACHEⅡ评分在评估危重症患者病情预后中的研究 被引量:12

Application of Blood Lactic Acid,Cholinesterase and APACHEⅡ Score in Evaluation of Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨危重症患者血乳酸、血清胆碱酯酶水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性及指导预后的意义。方法回顾性分析65例人住笔者医院ICU中危重症患者的临床资料,根据其预后将患者分为存活组和死亡组,比较血乳酸、血清胆碱酯酶水平与不同APACHEⅡ分值组之间的关系,分析上述指标与患者预后的关系。结果死亡组患者的血乳酸、血清胆碱酯酶水平及APACHEⅡ评分明显高于存活组(P〈0.05);APACHEⅡ评分21-30分组血乳酸及血清胆碱酯酶水平明显高于≤10分及11-20分组(P〈0.05),APACHEⅡ评分〉30分组血乳酸及血清胆碱酯酶水平明显高于21-30分组(P〈0.05);血乳酸水平与APACHEⅡ分值的相关性呈显著正相关(r:0.909,P〈0.01),血清胆碱酯酶水平与APACHEⅡ评分密切相关,呈现负相关(r=-0.795,P〈0.05),血清胆碱酯酶与血乳酸的变化呈现负相关(r=-0.783,P〈0.05)。结论血乳酸、血清胆碱酯酶水平与APACHEⅡ评分均与病情严重程度相关,在危重症患者预后判断中具有一定临床指导意义。 Objective To investigate the correlation between the blood lactic acid, serum cholinesterase and APACHE II score and the prognostic value in critically ill patients. Methods The clinical data of 65 critically ill patients, admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) , were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups : the survival group and the death group according to progno- sis. Grouped according to APACHE Ⅱ score comparison among all groups of blood lactic acid and serum cholinesterase of the differences. Its correlation with the progonosis of patients was analyzed. Results Blood lactic acid, serum cholinesterase and APACHE Ⅱ score in thedeath group respectively,were significantly higher than those in the survival group (P 〈 0.01 ). The blood lactic acid and serum cholines- terase in patients with APACHE II score 21 -30 group were significantly higher than ≤ 10 group and 11 -20 group( P 〈 0.05 ). Theses in- dexes in patients with APACHE II score 〉 30 group were significantly higher than 21 -30 group( P 〈 O. 05 ). The blood lactic acid level was positive correlated with APACHE I1 score ( r = 0. 909, P 〈 0.05 ) , negatively correlated with serum cholinesterase and APACHE Ⅱ score ( r = - 0. 795, P 〈 0.05). Serum cholinesterase level was negative correlated with APACHE Ⅱ score ( r = - 0. 783, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The blood lactic acid, serum cholinesterase and APACHE N score were associated with the disease severity,and show clini- cal value in predicting the prognosis of critical illness.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2014年第3期65-67,共3页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 乳酸 胆碱酯酶 APACHEⅡ评分 预后 Blood lactic acid Cholinesterase APACHE Ⅱ score Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1谭伟丽,蒋丽红.急性生理学与慢性健康状况Ⅱ评分在外科危重患者中的应用价值[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(5):310-310. 被引量:18
  • 2肖军,钟荣,叶桂山.APACHE、SAPS及LODS3种评分系统在单一重症监护室的应用比较[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(12):743-747. 被引量:33
  • 3Sculier JP, Paesmans M, iVlarkiewicz E, et al. Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (8): 2786-2792. 被引量:1
  • 4el-Solh AA, Grant BJ. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric Patients. Chest, 1996,110(5) : 1299-1304. 被引量:1
  • 5Schafer JH,Maurer A,Jochimsen F,et al. Outcome prediction models on admission in a medical intensive care unit:do they predict individual outcome? Crit Care Med, 1990, 18 (10) : 1111- 1118. 被引量:1
  • 6Moreau R,Soupison T,Vauquelin P,et al. Comparison of two simplified severity scores (SAPS and APACHE II) for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med, 1989,17(5) :409-413. 被引量:1
  • 7Moreno R, Morais P. Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, portuguese study. Intensive Care Med, 1997,23 (2) : 177-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Del Bufalo C, Morelli A, Bassein L, et at. Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE I predicted mortality better than SAPS I . Respir Care, 1995,40(10) :1042-1047. 被引量:1
  • 9Markgraf R, Deutschinoff G, Pientka L, et al. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations I and II and simplified acute physiology score I :a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (1):26-33. 被引量:1
  • 10Ratanarat R, Thanakittiwirun M, Vilaichone W, et al. Prediction of mortality by using the standard scoring systems in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai, 2005,88 (7) : 949-955. 被引量:1

共引文献308

同被引文献102

  • 1社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3062
  • 2王超,苏强,张淑文,阴赪宏,王红,王宝恩.多器官功能障碍综合征病情严重度评分系统[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(4):497-500. 被引量:33
  • 3Checldey W, Martin GS, Brown SM, et al. Structure, process, and annual ICU mortality across 69 centers: United States Critical Ill- ness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2014, 42(2): 344-356. 被引量:1
  • 4Dimopoulos G, Koulenti D, Blot S, et al. Critically ill elderly adults with infection: analysis of the extended prevalence of infec- tion in intensive care study [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2013, 61(12): 2065-2071. 被引量:1
  • 5Lamontagne F, McIntyre L, Dodek P, et al. Nonleg venous thrombo- sis in critically iU adults: a nested prospective cohort study [J]. JA MA Intern Med, 2014, 174(5): 689-696. 被引量:1
  • 6邱海波.ICU主治医师手册[M].2版,南京:江苏科学技术出版社.2013:27. 被引量:1
  • 7Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A,et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock,2012 [J].Intensive Care Medicine, 2013,39 (2) : 165. 被引量:1
  • 8Mantha S,Cabral K,Ansell J.New avenues for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Clinical Pharmacokinetics . 2012 被引量:1
  • 9Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of American / American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adult [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007 (44 Suppl 2): S27-S72. 被引量:1
  • 10Richard G, Levy H, Laterre PF, et al. CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE II to assess mortality risk in patients with severe sepsis and community acquired pneumonia in PROWESS [J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2011, 26 (1): 34- 40. 被引量:1

引证文献12

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部