期刊文献+

3种危重症评分系统对心脏大血管外科术后患者预后评估的分析 被引量:7

Analysis of prognosis assessment with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅲ, multiple organ dysfunction score and sequential organ failure assessment for the postoperative patients in cardiovascular surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 分析比较在心脏大血管手术后应用急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分 (APACHE )、多器官功能障碍综合征 (MODS)评分以及序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 3种评分系统对患者预后评估的临床意义。方法 对 2 0 0 4年 2— 6月的 6 8例心脏大血管手术患者在心脏外科重症监护室治疗期间每日应用APACHE 、MODS和 SOFA评估其预后 ,并进行统计学相关分析。结果 术后 1~ 3d,APACHE 、MODS和 SOFA评分没有统计学差异 ,但均显著高于入室时各评分基础值 A0、M0和 S0水平 (P均 <0 .0 1) ;每日各评分值与基础值间的差值ΔA、ΔM和Δ S虽然逐渐降低 ,但没有统计学差异。 APACHE 评分与 MODS正相关 ,但相关性下降 (1d时 P<0 .0 1;3d时 P<0 .0 5 ) ;与 SOFA仅在 1d和 2 d呈正相关 (P均 <0 .0 1) ;MODS与 SOFA始终呈显著正相关 (P<0 .0 0 1)。心脏外科重症治疗监护病房停留时间与 A0和 Am ax正相关 (P<0 .0 5 ) ;与 M0、Mm ax以及 S0、Sm ax呈显著正相关 (P<0 .0 0 1)。结论 对于心脏大血管外科围手术期患者 ,A0可较准确地预测其预后 ;MODS和 SOFA对预后的评估能力优于 APACHE ;个体化 Smax和动态 Δ S可能是最合适的指标。 Objective To analyze the clinical significance of the prognosis assessment with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅲ(APACHEⅢ), multiple organ dysfunction score(MODS) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) for postoperative patients in cardiovascular surgery. Methods Prognosis of 68 patients undergoing cardiovascular operation from February 2004 to June 2004 in our ward was assessed by APACHE Ⅲ, MODS and SOFA. Then the scores were calculated and compared everyday while they stayed in Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU). Results The scores of three methods showed no significant difference from one another in the first three postoperative days, but were significantly higher than all the scores calculated just after the entrance to the CSICU (A0, M0, S0; all P <0 01). There were no differences in the changes of APACHEⅢ, MODS and SOFA(ΔA, ΔM and ΔS) in the first three postoperative days respectively, although they all showed a decreasing tendency. APACHEⅢ scores were positively correlated with MODS although the correlation were diminishing( P <0 01 at first day but P <0 05 at third day), while they were positively correlated with SOFA only in the first two days (both P <0 01). The MODS was positively correlated with SOFA at various time points( P <0 001). The length of stay in CSICU was positive correlated with A0 and maximum of APACHEⅢ(Amax, P <0 05), and M0, maximum of MODS(Mmax) as well as S0, maximum of SOFA(Smax, P <0 001), respectively. Conclusion For the patients who have undergone cardiovascular operation, A0 could assess the prognosis fairly precisely, but MODS and SOFA assessment seem to be better than APACHE Ⅲ. Individual Smax and kinetic ΔS might be the most suitable indexes for cardiovascular surgery.
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 2004年第11期673-676,共4页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
关键词 多器官功能障碍评分 序贯器官衰竭评估 急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅲ 外科手术 心血管 预后 multiple organ dysfunction score sequential organ failure assessment acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅲ cardiovascular surgery prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Vincent J L,Moreno R,Takala J,et al.The SOFA (sepsis related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure[J].Intensive Care Med,1996,22:707-710. 被引量:1
  • 2Marshall J C,Cook D J,Christon N V,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction score:a realizable descriptor of a complex clinic outcome[J].Crit Care Med,1995,23:1638-1652. 被引量:1
  • 3IPSP,Leung T F,IPCY.Outcome of critically ill elderly patients is high-dependency care for geriatric patients worthwhile[J]?Crit Care Med,1999,27:2351-2357. 被引量:1
  • 4Bridgewater B,Grayson A D,Jackson M,et al.Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery:comparison between crude and risk stratified data[J].BMJ,2003,327:13-17. 被引量:1
  • 5Daly K,Beale R,Chang R W S.Reduction in mortality after inappropriate early discharge from intensive care unit:logistic regression triage model[J].BMJ,2001,322:1-6. 被引量:1
  • 6胡小琴..心血管麻醉及体外循环[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999:988.
  • 7朱晓东,薛淦兴主编..心脏外科指南[M].北京/西安:世界图书出版公司,1990:706.
  • 8Knaus W A,Wagner D P,Draper E A,et al.The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system:risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults[J].Chest,1991,100:1619-1636. 被引量:1
  • 9李海玲,任红贤,林慧艳,黄金林,刘宏.APACHEⅢ评分在ICU中的应用评价[J].中国危重病急救医学,2002,14(5):303-304. 被引量:35
  • 10江学成.危重疾病严重程度评分临床应用和意义[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(4):195-197. 被引量:287

二级参考文献8

共引文献395

同被引文献107

引证文献7

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部