摘要
同为亚太区域经济一体化平台,APEC和TPP有交叉也有差异。从成员、实际进展、运行准则和机制、一体化内容等方面的比较可见,APEC代表了"开放的地区主义",而TPP奉行的是"封闭的地区主义",后者更具约束力,且TPP在相关领域的规则制定和要求远比APEC具体、严格、有针对性。在这种形势下,我国应表明四项主张。
This paper compared the development of APEC and TPP. From the staff, the actual progress, operational guidelines and mechanisms, the content and other aspects, APEC pursues ＂open regionalism＂ while TPP pursues ＂closed regionalisrn＂ . The latter has more force of constraint, and stricter rules. In such a situation, China should indicate four proposals： First, APEC should accept RTAs among the members, including TPP, but should begin to balance these RTAs and coordinate each other. Second, confirm the positive effects of APEC, meanwhile, reform APEC and improve its assessment mechanism, so as to achieve the ＂Bogor Goals＂ . Third, continue to play the APEC features, advocate expanding the voice of developing countries. Fourth, on the basis of the existing achievements in APEC, further promote trade and investment facilitation among APEC members.
出处
《亚太经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期21-25,32,共6页
Asia-Pacific Economic Review
