期刊文献+

后阿富汗战争时期的美国中亚外交展望(英文) 被引量:14

US Central Asia Diplomacy in the Post-Afghanistan War Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 American academia has three viewpoints regarding American policy in American in Central Asia in the post-Afghanistan era, or three choices facing America: a comprehensive entry, limited intervention or phasing out. Of these a these three options, the limited intervention is the most possible one from the perspective of strategic priorities, resources allocations as well as realistic possibility. This involves the breadth and depth of the intervention. During the past 13 years,the war in Afghanistan has dominated the U.S.Central Asia policy.After the U.S.withdrawal from Afghanistan,the structure of the U.S.interests in Central Asia will change because the war in Afghanistan will no longer be the dominant factor in U.S.policy in Central Asia.Central Asia's role in U.S.foreign policy will decrease,and the U.S.'s concern for Central Asia will subsequently be reduced.The position of the U.S.in Central Asia will decline,but its freedom of policy choice will be increased.Russia and China's influence will rise,and the geopolitical importance of Central Asia will return to the main focus of American policy.The competition between the world powere will change to a new form.The U.S.will continue to promote the new 'silk road'strategy to continue to participate in the 'great game'in Central Asia,but there are different opinions regarding whether Russia or China will be the main opponent to the U.S.in the region.
作者 Zhao Huasheng
出处 《国际问题研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期79-95,144-145,共17页 International Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Jeffrey Mankoff, Foreword by Andrew C. Kuchins, The United States and Central Asia after 2014, A Report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia Program, January 2013, p. V. 被引量:1
  • 2National Committee on American Foreign Policy, Central Asia/Caspian Sea Basin Region after the Withdrawal of U.S. and N ATO Troops from Afghanistan, Roundtable Report, Novemberl3-14, 2013, p. 4. 被引量:1
  • 3Richard A. Boucher (Assistant Secretary For South And Central Asian Affairs) , "U.S. Policy in Central Asia : Balancing Priorities ( Part II) , " Hearing before the Subcommittee of the Middle East and Central Asia of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, April 26, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 4Rob- ert O. Blake, Jr. (Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs), "U.S. Policy towards Central Asia," July 30, 2010, http://www.state.gov/p/sca/rls/rmks/2010/145463.htm. 被引量:1
  • 5Robert O. Blake, Jr. (Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs) , "The Obama Administration's Priorities in South and Central Asia," January 19, 2011, http://www.state.gov/ p/sea/rls/rmks/2011 / 155002. htm. 被引量:1
  • 6Robert O. Blake, Jr. ( Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs) , Testimo- ny before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Subcommittee on Europe and Eurasia, March 10, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 7Joshua Kucera, "Does The U.S. Have Any Interests In Central Asia?" February 6, 2013, ht- tp ://www.eurasianet.org/node/66515. 被引量:1
  • 8Dmitry Gorenburg, "Does the US have vital security interests in Central Asia?" October 14, 2013, http ://valdaiclub.com/blogs/63720.htm1. 被引量:1
  • 92013年2月5日美国国际战略研究中心举行的“2014年后的美国与中亚”研讨会上的发言,http://csis.ors/event/united-states-and-central-asia-after一2014. 被引量:1
  • 10美国外交政策委员会2013年11月关于美国撤军后中亚和里海地区形势圆桌讨论会报告. 被引量:1

同被引文献205

引证文献14

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部