期刊文献+

本科教学中的高阶学习:问题、实践和挑战 被引量:14

Higher-Order Learning in Undergraduate Education: Issues, Practices and Challenge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据多所高校的学生调查数据和访谈数据,分析了我国本科教学中高阶学习的现状以及促进高阶学习的本科教学实践,并提出"高阶学习挑战模型"。研究发现:(1)我国本科高年级课程比低年级课程更注重高阶学习,虽然统计上差异显著,但实际差异细微;(2)我国本科课程对各项认知能力的强调程度均不及美国,而且在高阶学习方面差距非常大;(3)我国本科高年级课程中的高阶学习教学实践数量少但形式丰富;(4)高阶学习的教学实践对学习者提出了认知维度和情感维度的挑战,对教师以及大学师生关系也提出了新的要求。总之,本文考察了NSSE"高阶学习"量表在我国的应用,揭示了教师在推动学生高阶学习过程中的核心作用,为我国本科教学实践敲响了警钟。 Based on multi-institutional undergraduate student survey data and interview data, mls empirical study analyzes institutional emphasis on higher-order learning and teaching practices that promote higher-order learning. A Higher-Order Learning Challenge Model is proposed in the article. Research findings include: (1) compared with low-level classes, high-level classes lay more emphasis on higher-order learning with statistical significance but little practical significance; (2) compared with American education, Chinese undergraduate courses lay less emphasis on all levels of cognitive abilities and higher-order learning in particular, (3) higher-level undergraduate courses tend to employ multiple forms of curricular practices that promote higher-order learning; (4) educational practices that promote higher-order learning bring challenges for learners both on the cognitive dimension and on the affective dimension, and they also challenge faculty and student-faculty relationship in Chinese undergraduate education. The study's implications for future research, educational practices, and higher education policy are also discussed.
作者 岑逾豪
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期47-53,共7页 Fudan Education Forum
关键词 高阶学习 本科教学 有效教育实践 实证研究 高阶学习挑战模型 Higher-Order Learning Undergraduate Teaching and Learning Effective Educational Practice Empirical Research Higher-0rder Learning Challenge Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1NELSON LAIRD T F, SHOUP R, KUH G D. Measuring Deep Approaches to Learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 2National Survey of Student Engagement. Reliability: 2011 internal consistency. What is the internal consistency of the Deep Learning scales? JR]. 2011. 被引量:1
  • 3National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time - annual results 2009 [R]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 4CHICKERING A W, GAMSON Z F. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education [J]. AAHE Bulletin, 1987, 39(7): 3-7. 被引量:1
  • 5Campbell C M, Cabrera A F. Making the mark: are grades and deep learning rela~ed? [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Las Vegas, NV, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 6徐明慧,罗杰.博学.“教学学术”运动面临的困境[J].高教发展与评估,2012,28(2):32-36. 被引量:13
  • 7NELSON LAIRD T F, GARVER A K, NISKODE-DOSSETT A S, BANKS J V. The predictive validity of a measure of Deep Approaches to Learning [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Studv of Hie.her Education..lacksonville. FL. 2008. 被引量:1
  • 8National Survey of Student Engagement. Factor analysis: 2009 internal structure for Deep Learning. Does the second-order factor solution, as found using NSSE 2005 data fit the 2009 NSSE data?[R]. 2009. 被引量:1
  • 9EVANS N J, FORNEY D S, GUIDO-BIBRITO F, PATTON L D, RENN K A. Student development in college: Theory, research and practice[M]. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 10National Survey of Student Engagement. Reliability: 2010 internal consistency. How well do NSSE Deep Learning scales measure asingle latent construct?[R]. 2010. 被引量:1

二级参考文献48

共引文献403

同被引文献167

引证文献14

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部