期刊文献+

浅析Mazurkewich关于与格结构习得研究

Mazurkewich's Theory on the Acquisition of Dative Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过对Mazurkewich研究的反思,指出了其研究理论和实验的不足之处,尤其是在分析被试没有产生过度泛化的原因时,其忽略了一个重要的根本因素——感知突显。未来有关与格转换习得的研究,应充分结合标记性理论和感知突显因素。 According to the study on Mazurkewich' s theory, the inadequacy of the theory and experiment is pointed out. It is pointed out that perceptual salience is ignored when analy- zing the reason why the subject did not experience overgeneralization. Therefore, the following studies should consider markedness and perceptual salience. Moreover, it is also suggested to improve the experimental design to clarify the perceptual salience and complete markedness theory.
作者 孟繁
机构地区 西安外国语大学
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2014年第3期124-126,共3页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 与格动词 与格转换 过度泛化 感知突显 标记性理论 dative verbs dative form transformation overgeneralization perceptual sali-ence markedness
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mazurkewich. I. Acquisition of Dative Alternation by Second Language Learners and Linguistic Theory[J]. Language Learning, 1984, ( 34 ). 被引量:1
  • 2Mazurkewich. I. Syntactic Markedness and Language Acquisition[ J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisi- tion, 1985, (7). 被引量:1
  • 3Bardovi-Harlig. K. Markedness and Salience in Sec- ond-language Acquisition [ J l. Language Learning, 1987, (37). 被引量:1
  • 4Brown, R. , &C. Hanlon. Cognition and the Develop- ment of Language[ M ]. New York : John Wiley&Sons, 1970. 被引量:1
  • 5Fillmore. C. The Indirect Object Construction in Eng- lish and the Ordering of Transformations [ M ]. The Huge : Mouton, 1965. 被引量:1
  • 6Jackendoff. R. &P. Culicover. A Reconsideration of Dative Movements [ J ]. Foundations of Language, 1971 ,(7). 被引量:1
  • 7Jackendoff. R. Morphological and Semantic Regulari- ties in the Lexicon [ J ]. Language, 1975, ( 51 ). 被引量:1
  • 8Emonds. J. Evidence that Indirect Object Rule is a Structure-preserving Rule [ J ]. Foundations of Lan- guage, 1972, ( 8 ). 被引量:1
  • 9Oehrle. R. T. The Grammatical Status of the Dative Al- ternation in English [ M ]. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT, 1976. 被引量:1
  • 10Chomsky, N. Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar [ M ]. Pisa : Scula Normale Superiore, 1981. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

  • 1蔡金亭.中国学生英语过渡语中的作格动词—一项实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(4):283-289. 被引量:51
  • 2?erlmutter,D. M. Impersonal Passives and the Unac- cusative Hypothesis[A]. In Proceedings of the Fourth nnual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society [C ]. Berkely : Berkely Linguistics Society, 1978. 被引量:1
  • 3Burzio, L. Italian Syntax: A Government - binding Ap- proach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. 被引量:1
  • 4Levin, B. , & Rappaport, M. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax - lexical Semantics Interface [M]. Cambridge Mass : MIT Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 5Ju, M. K. Overpassivization Errors by Second Lan- guage Learners:The Effect of Conceptualizable Agents in Diseourse[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisi- tion.2000. (22). 被引量:1
  • 6Oshita, H. What Is Happened May not Be What Ap- pears to Be Happening: A Corpus Study of "Passive" Unaccusatives in L2 English[ J ]. Second Language Research,2000, (4). 被引量:1
  • 7Yip, V. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English Massachusetts [ M]. Harvard University Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 8Dixon,R. M. W. A New Approach to English Grammar on Semantic Principles [ M ]. Oxford : Clarend Press, 1991. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部