摘要
在解读传统中国的"情理裁判"时,学界往往只关注"情"这一个案表征,而忽略了"情理"本身的可普遍化诉求,以至将中国传统司法视为西方近现代形式法治的对极。事实上在情理裁判的展开过程中,可普遍化证成是一条构成性的司法原则。可普遍化证成为中国古典司法的现代解读,提供了一个新的视角。基于可普遍化证成原则,情理考量能够以恰当的方式进入现代法律论辩的场域内。
While working on the ＂judgment based on Qing（ human sentiment）-Li（reason）＂, the academ- ics often fucus on ＂Qing＂ only, rather than the generalized potential of ＂Qing-iI＂, which simply classify the traditional Chinese adjudication as opposed to that of modern West. However, the principle of generalization is a constitutive one in the structure of the judgment based on Qing-Li, which provides a new perspective for the modem analysis of the traditional Chinese adjudication. Based on this principle, the consideration of Qing-Li can be brought into the field of modem legal discourse.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期22-29,共8页
Modern Law Science
基金
浙江大学"走向世界的中国法哲学"985工程项目
国家社科基金项目"疑案裁判中的法律判断模型研究"(10CFX033)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词
情理
情理裁判
可普遍化原则
一阶证明
二阶证明
Qing-Li
judgment based on Qing-Li
generalization principle
first-order justification
sec- ond-order justification
