期刊文献+

董事会与R&D投入的权变模型:控股股东类型的调节效应 被引量:4

A Contingency Model of Board of Directors and R&D Investment:The Moderating Effect of Types of Holding Stockholders
原文传递
导出
摘要 董事会的效应依赖于组织情境,控股股东类型是重要的情境因素之一。从权变理论视角,以2007-2011年披露R&D投入的我国上市公司为样本,采用层级回归方法,检验了控股股东类型对董事会与R&D投入的调节作用。研究发现,董事会规模、董事会持股比例、董事会会议次数对R&D投入的影响根据控股股东类型而产生权变,而独立董事比例与R&D投入的正相关关系并未随之而改变。关注了情境因素对董事会治理行为及其效果的影响,并使用权变方法整合了多种董事会理论。 Board effectiveness depends on the organizational contingencies and the types of holding stockholders is one of the important contextual factors. From the point of view of contingency theory, this paper examines the moderating effect of the types of holding stockholders on the relationship between board of directors and R&D investment using a sample of Chinese listed firms disclosing R&D investment from 2007 to 2011 and hierarchical regression modeling. The results indicate that the influence of board size, independent director ratios, board ownership and board meeting frequency on R&D investment is contingent upon the types of holding stockholders. This paper focuses on the influences of contextual factor on board effectiveness and uses contingency method to integrate multiple board theories.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期10-17,共8页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272119) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(13YJA630109) 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2013GM020)
关键词 董事会 R&D投入 权变 控股股东类型 Board of Directors R&D Investment Contingency Types of Holding Stockholders
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Miller T, Triana M. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009,46 (5): 755- 786. 被引量:1
  • 2Baysinger B D, Kosnik R D, Turk T A. Effects of board ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34 : 205 -214. 被引量:1
  • 3Boyd B K, Haynes K T, Zona F. Dimensions of CEO-board relations . Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48 : 1892- 1923. 被引量:1
  • 4Zona F, Zattoni A, Minichilli A. A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size [J]. British Journal of Management, 2013,24 (3) : 299- 315. 被引量:1
  • 5Choi S B, Park B, Hong P. Does ownership structure matter for firm technological innovation performance? The case of Korean firms . Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2012,20(3) : 267-288. 被引量:1
  • 6李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010,45(5):55-67. 被引量:655
  • 7温军,冯根福.异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J].经济研究,2012,47(3):53-64. 被引量:518
  • 8Ocasio W. Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in US industrial corpo- rations, 1960- 1990 [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994,39: 285- 312. 被引量:1
  • 9Sah R D, Stiglitz J E. The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies [J]. American Economic Review, 1986,76 : 716- 727. 被引量:1
  • 10Chen H L, Hsu W T. Family ownership, board independence, and R*D investment . Family Business Review, 2009,22 (4) : 347 - 362. 被引量:1

二级参考文献91

共引文献2993

同被引文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部