摘要
我国《行政诉讼法》规定了公民、法人或其他组织可以在行政复议与行政诉讼这两种救济途径之间自由选择。一些学者在借鉴国外立法经验的基础上主张我国应适用穷尽行政救济原则,以更好地促进行政救济功能的实现与公民权利的维护。然而,穷尽行政救济原则在一些特殊情形下毫无必要,这样便产生了穷尽行政救济原则的例外。我国行政诉讼制度的发展,应在充分考虑我国国情的基础上,借鉴美国的经验,在确立"穷尽行政救济原则"的同时,规定穷尽行政救济原则的例外情形,以进一步协调行政复议与行政诉讼的相互关系,切实实现民权保护与节约行政资源的双重目标。
Administrative Procedure Law of China provides freedom of self - choice between administrative remedies and adminis- trative proceedings for citizens, legal persons and other organizations. Some scholars insisted that we should apply the principles of exhaustion of administrative remedies by learning experience from foreign legislation in order to promote the realization of ad- ministrative remedies and maintenance of civil rights. However, the principles of exhaustion of administrative remedies will lose its necessity under some special conditions and there are exceptions to the principles of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Under the development of administrative proceeding system and on the basis of fully considering the condition of our country and learning the experience of the United States, this paper argues that when we amend the law to confirm the principles of exhaustion of administrative remedies, we should also bring the exceptions to the principles of exhaustion of administrative remedies into leg- islation in order to improve the applicable relationship of administrative remedies and administrative proceedings and realize the dual goals of protecting civil rights and conservation of administrative resources.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期142-148,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
穷尽行政救济
行政复议
行政诉讼
适用例外
启示
exhaustion of administrative remedies
administrative reconsideration
administrative proceedings
applicable excep-tions
enlightment
