期刊文献+

排污权交易条件下厂商污染治理技术投资最优控制策略 被引量:6

Optimal Control for Technology Investment in Pollution Abatement under Tradable Emissions Permits
下载PDF
导出
摘要 排污权交易制度可使厂商为自身的利益提高治污的积极性,使污染总量控制目标真正得以实现。在文献[8]的研究基础上,建立了一个基于排污权交易的厂商污染治理技术投资模型,并运用最优控制理论和方法研究了在不同情况下厂商污染治理技术投资的最优控制策略问题;此外,对理论分析的结果进行了数据模拟。 Assuming the level of pollution emission of the manufacturer's production depends on the existing pollution emission level and the level of technology investment in pollution treatment, we establish the model of manufacturer's profit. We use the optimal control theory and method, and analyze manufacturer 's optimal dynamic investment level of pollution treatment technology and the optimal level of output in three cases. The results show that emissions trading system can motivate manufacturers to invest in pollution treatment technology effectively.
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 2014年第1期57-61,共5页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 湖南省教育厅科技重点项目(13A084) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助项目(11YBB324) 上海哲学社会科学规划课题(2012BJB002)
关键词 污染治理技术投资 排污权交易 最优控制 pollution treatment technology investment tradable emissions permits optimal control
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Orr L. Incentives for innovation as the basis of effluent charge strategy[J].American Economic Review,1976.441-447. 被引量:1
  • 2Magat W. Pollution control and technologicaladvance:A model of the firm[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1978,(05):1-25. 被引量:1
  • 3Milliman S R,Prince R. Firm incentive to promotetechnological change in pollution control[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1989.247-256. 被引量:1
  • 4Jung C,Krutilla K,Boyd R. Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level:An evaluation of policy alternatives[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996.95-111. 被引量:1
  • 5Gersbach H,Glazer A. Markets and regulatory holdup problems[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1999.151-164. 被引量:1
  • 6Chávez C,Stranlund J. A note on emissions taxes and incomplete information[J].European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,2009,(01):137-144. 被引量:1
  • 7LinTT,Huang S. An entry and exit model on the energy-saving investment strategy with real options[J].Energy Policy,2010.794-802. 被引量:1
  • 8Dragone D,Lambertini L,Leitmann G. A stochastic optimal control model of pollution abatement[J].Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory,2010,(02):117-124. 被引量:1

同被引文献34

  • 1储益萍.排污权交易初始价格定价方案研究[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(S2):380-382. 被引量:15
  • 2冯建中,乔苏亚.水体自净系数计算[J].山西化工,1993,13(2):51-53. 被引量:11
  • 3McDonald R,Siegel D. The value of waiting to invest[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986,101 ~ 707-727. 被引量:1
  • 4Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. A comparison of French and Swedish experience from taxes on industrial air pollution [ R]. CESifo DICE Report 1/2004. 被引量:1
  • 5Dixit A K,Pindyek R S. Investment under uneertainty[M]. New York ~ Princeton University Press, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 6Kort P M, vanLoon J J M, Luptacik M. Optimal dynamic environmental policies of a profit maximizing firm[J]. Journal of Economics, 1991,54 : 195-225. 被引量:1
  • 7Poter M. America' s green strategy E Jl. Scientific American, 1991(4) :168. 被引量:1
  • 8Cropper M L, Oates W E. Environmental economics~ A survey [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1992,30 : 675-740. 被引量:1
  • 9Jaffe A B, Palmer K. Environmental Regulation and innovation:a panel data study[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997,79 (4) :610-619. 被引量:1
  • 10Altman M. When green isn't mean: economic theory and the heuristics of the impact of environmental regulations on competitiveness and opportunity cost [- J ]. Ecological Economics, 2001,36(1) :31-44. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部