摘要
与将卢梭作为一位折中的思想家的印象相反,这篇论文试图重建他的人类学体系的核心。首先,讨论方法论的起点问题。第二,展开论述使自然得以在社会背景下作为一种理想运作所需的结构框架。最后,根据这种框架阐释卢梭的起源论述。这个过程使我解决了两个阐释难题,关于坏的起源的困境和人的自然孤独的问题。引入一个逻辑学上的双重概念来整合历史的和结构的要求,这个概念与卢梭思想中的自由和必然性相重叠。用这种照镜子的方式来组织我的论证,我把这项工作称作一篇随笔,因为它是在尽力思考卢梭为了写他所写的东西一定会想过什么。
Against the impression that Rousseau is an eclectic thinker,this paper is an attempt to reconstruct the systematic core of his anthropology. First,I discuss the methodological starting-point. Second,I develop the structural framework required to make the concept of nature operative as an ideal within social contexts. Finally,I interpret Rousseau's genetic account in terms of this framework. Such a procedure allows me to solve two interpretative problems,the aporia of the origin of wickedness and the question of man's natural isolation. A twofold notion of logic is introduced to integrate the demands of history and structure,which overlap with those of freedom and necessity in Rousseau's thought. This organizes my argument in a mirror-like way. I call this undertaking an essay,for it is the endeavor to think what Rousseau must have thought in order to write what he wrote.
出处
《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2014年第1期69-82,共14页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
