期刊文献+

入世后我国股市风险与收益动态关系研究 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 风险与收益关系一直是金融经济学关注的热点问题。本文以入世后沪深股价指数为样本,考察中国股票市场中风险与收益之间的动态关系。结果发现,沪深两市日收益与时变波动率之间呈显著的正相关关系,而周收益与时变波动率之间的正相关关系在统计上不显著。基于扩展GARCH-M系列模型的研究进一步发现,交易量对股票收益具有一定的预测能力,能够为风险与收益关系估计带来有用信息。本文还证实,中国股市存在显著的方差持续效应,CGARCH-M技术对中国股市风险与收益关系的拟合效果相对优于其他模型,而有关波动率非对称现象的研究结论尚不明确。 The dynamic relation~,;hip between risk and return is always an important issue in financial economy. With a sample ranging over the period after the entry into WTO, this paper explores the risk-return tradeoff in the Chinese emerging stock markets. The empirical results show that the daily returns significantly positively relate to the conditional volatility in both Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets while the positive relationship becomes insignificant for the weekly return. The Aug-GARCH-M type model reveals that trading volume does represent valuable information flow to be used in the prediction of risk-return tradeoff. A significant persistent effect of the conditional variance is found in both markets, regardless of the fre- quency of data. This study supports that the CGARCH-M technology might be a more reasonable model to use among the GARCH-M type models.
作者 陈梦根
出处 《投资研究》 北大核心 2013年第11期138-149,共12页 Review of Investment Studies
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NECT-11-0029) 全国统计科学研究计划项目(2012LZ042) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA630005 12YJC910005) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2012WZD02 105504GK)的资助
关键词 风险 收益 交易量 GARCH—M系列模型 Return Risk Trading Volume GARCH-M Type Models
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

二级参考文献32

  • 1王燕辉,王凯涛.股票交易量对收益率波动性的影响-对深市个股的实证分析[J].金融研究,2004(12):81-88. 被引量:26
  • 2王燕辉,王凯涛.股市交易量与收益率的关联分析[J].系统工程,2005,23(1):59-62. 被引量:15
  • 3B. Mandelbrot, 1963,“The variation of certain speculative prices”, Journal of Business, Vol. 36, pp. 394 -419. 被引量:1
  • 4Engle, R. , 1982, “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U. K. Inflation,” ECONOMETRICA,50, 987 - 1008. 被引量:1
  • 5BOLLERSLEV, Tim, 1986, “Generalized autoregressive conditional hetemscedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327,. 被引量:1
  • 6Breen, W., L. R., Glosten, R., Jagannathan, 1989,“Economic Significance of Predictable VariationsinStock Index Retums,” Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 44 (5) , pages 1177 -89. 被引量:1
  • 7Bollerslev, T. and JM Wooldridge, 1992. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances, Econometric Reviews 11, 143-179. 被引量:1
  • 8Bekaert, C. and C. Wu. 2000. Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 13 (l) :1-42. 被引量:1
  • 9Campbell, John Y. and Hentsehel, Ludger. 1992. No news is good news : An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economies, vol. 31 (3) , 281 -318. 被引量:1
  • 10Chang-Jin Kim, J. C. M. , Charles R. Nelson. 2004. Is there a positive relationship between stock market volatility and the equity premium. Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, Vol. 36. 被引量:1

共引文献391

同被引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部