期刊文献+

同步放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗食管癌的Meta分析 被引量:12

Meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用循证医学的方法评价同步放化疗与序贯放化疗在食管癌治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法电子检索Cochrane Library、Pubmed、Embase、CNKI、VIP、CBM、万方,手工检索相关杂志、会议论文、学位论文,收集同步放化疗对比序贯放化疗治疗食管癌的临床随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间为各数据库建库至2012年8月,对文献进行质量评价,按照Cochrane handbook并采用RevMan 5.1软件对数据进行Meta分析。结果纳入9项RCT,共收入754例患者。结果显示,同步放化疗与序贯放化疗治疗食管癌比较,总有效率和1、2、3年生存率以及局控率同步组均高于序贯组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);远处转移两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.85);放射性食管炎、胃肠道反应的发生同步组较序贯组高(P<0.05)。血液学毒性中白细胞减少有统计学意义(P<0.05),而血小板减少无统计学意义(P=0.53)。结论 Meta分析表明,同步放化疗治疗食管癌近期疗效及1、2、3年生存率和局控率优于序贯放化疗,但放射性食管炎、血液学毒性中的白细胞减少及胃肠道反应高于序贯组。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Methods Literatures were retrieved from Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, VIP, CBM, Wanfang and other databases by computer and those from conference papers and thesis by hand. Randomized control trials (RCT) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy for treatment of esophageal cancer were collected. The duration of searching was from the establishment of the databases up to August 2012. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software, in accordance with the cochrane handbook. Results The meta-analysis included 9 RCTs and involved 754 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the overall efficacy, 1, 2, 3-y survival rates and local control rates in concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were higher than those in sequential chemoradiotherapy group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). There was no significant difference in distant metastases between two groups ( P = 0. 85 ). The incidence of radiation esophagitis and gastrointestinal reactions in concurrent group was higher than that in sequential group (P 〈 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of leukopenia ( P 〈 0.05 ), but not in thrombocytopenia between two groups ( P = 0.53 ). Conclusion Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has better short-term efficacy and higher 1, 2, 3-y survival and local control rates than sequential chemotherapy in treatment of esophageal cancer, but has higher toxicity rate.
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2013年第6期605-611,共7页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 食管肿瘤 药物疗法 食管肿瘤 放射疗法 META分析 随机对照试验 esophageal neoplasms/drug therapy esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy meta-analysis randomized controlledtrial
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献73

共引文献127

同被引文献109

  • 1崔纪丽,侯志超,刘玉,彭秀青,李燕,郭二涛,袁果,陈莉莎,黄佳,杜丹凤,王立东.食管癌患者肿瘤最长径与浸润深度和淋巴结转移的关系及其对生存期的影响[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(3):214-220. 被引量:23
  • 2赵国强,王涛,赵明耀,何炜,杨红艳,王明臣,汤黎明,赵继敏,赵勤,董子明.食管正常、癌前及癌变组织中DNA聚合酶βmRNA检测[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2005,40(4):603-605. 被引量:5
  • 3杜柳涛,徐雷,杨杏芬,何云,魏青,庄志雄.人pol-β高表达对细胞应对DNA损伤反应时的影响[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2006,24(2):88-91. 被引量:8
  • 4王家明,吕长兴,刘俊,王常禄,郭金栋.Ⅲ期食管癌同步放化疗与序贯性放化疗疗效比较[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(5):374-377. 被引量:35
  • 5Tepper J,Krasna MJ ,Niedzwiecki D,et al. Phase HI trialof trimodality therapy with cisplatin,fluorouracil,radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone foresophageal cancer: CALGB 9781 [J]. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(7) :1086 -1092. 被引量:1
  • 6Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiationwith and without surgery in patients with locally advancedsquamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus [ J ]. J ClinOncol,2005 ,23(10):2310 -2317. 被引量:1
  • 7Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche 0,et al. Chemoradiationfollowed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alonein squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102 [ J]. JClin Oncol,2007 ,25( 10) : 1160 - 1168. 被引量:1
  • 8Therasse P, Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA, et al. Newguidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solidtumors. European Organization for Research andTreatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of theUnited States,National Cancer Institute of Canada [ J ]. JNatl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3) :205 -216. 被引量:1
  • 9Lacouture ME, Maitland ML, Segaert S, et al. A proposedEGFR inhibitor dermatologic adverse event-specificgrading scale from the MASCC skin toxicity study group[J] . Support Care Cancer,2010,18(4) :509 -522. 被引量:1
  • 10Herskovic A,Martz K,Al-Sarraf M, et al. Combinedchemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiothe-rapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus [ J ]. NEngl J Med, 1992,326(24) :1593 - 1598. 被引量:1

引证文献12

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部